Path Integral Troubleshooting: Dealing with Delta Distributions in the Exponent

mhill
Messages
180
Reaction score
1
I am having troubles to solve the functional integral:

\int D( X) e^{i(\dot X)^{2}+ a\delta (X-1)+ b\delta (X-3)

if a and b were 0 the integral is just a Gaussian integral but i do not know how to deal with the Delta distribution inside some may help ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have difficulty understanding what X is. Is it some variable, or is it a function, like X(x). When you write

<br /> \int\mathcal{D}X<br />

it looks like X is a function, for example X:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} or X:[-L,L]\to\mathbb{R} or something similar. But when you write

<br /> \delta(X-3)<br />

it looks like X is just some parameter, like X\in\mathbb{R}.

Or is the number 3 a constant function \mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}, 3(x)=3, and the delta function an infinite dimensional delta function, like \delta^{\mathbb{R}}?
 
if that is in path integral repreesetation, shouldn't there be an integral in the exponent.?,
e^{S(q)} where S(q) is the action which is an integration over relevant time period of the Lagrangian of system.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top