PDE: Annulus question, Steady State Temperature

RJLiberator
Gold Member
Messages
1,094
Reaction score
63

Homework Statement


Suppose the inner side of the annulus {(r,Φ): r_0 ≤ r ≤ 1} is insulated and the outer side is held at temperature u(1,0) = f(Φ).

a) Find the steady-state temperature
b) What is the solution if f(Φ) = 1+2sinΦ ?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



a)
A = {(rcosΦ,rsinΦ): r_0 ≤ r ≤ 1}
We have the conditions

U_rr + r^(-1)*U_r+r^(-2)*U_ΦΦ = 0 in A
U(1,Φ) = f(Φ)
U(r_0,Φ) = g(Φ)

Φ"+v^2Φ = 0
ϑ^2R"+rR'-v^2R = 0

Φ => e^(ivΦ) , v= 0,+/-1, +/-2, ...

r = a)n*r^v+b_n*r^(-v)

Hence, u(r,Φ) = ∑ c_n * r^(|n|)*e^(inΦ)

We know that
C_n = 1/(2*pi) integral from -pi to pi f(Φ)e^(-inΦ)dΦ

u(r,Φ) = ∑C_n * ( (r^n+r_0^(2n)*r^(-n)) / (1+r_0^(2n)) * e^(inΦ))

That is the answer for part a. Finding the steady state temperature.

My question is how did we get to that messy r fraction part. We see what I stated r to equal, and we know cn is right based off Fourier coefficients.

WE went from u(r,Φ) = ∑ c_n * r^(|n|)*e^(inΦ)
to u(r,Φ) = ∑C_n * ( (r^n+r_0^(2n)*r^(-n)) / (1+r_0^(2n)) * e^(inΦ))

Must I use the Poisson Kernel?

b) b is a little tougher for me to understand.

answer is u(r,Φ) = 1+2*((r^2+r_0^2)/ (r(1+r_0^2))) sinΦ

I started off by analyzing the c_n by inputting f(Φ) = 1+2sinΦ
we get that the integral =
Screen Shot 2016-03-12 at 11.33.05 PM.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RJLiberator said:

Homework Statement


Suppose the inner side of the annulus {(r,Φ): r_0 ≤ r ≤ 1} is insulated and the outer side is held at temperature u(1,0) = f(Φ).

a) Find the steady-state temperature
b) What is the solution if f(Φ) = 1+2sinΦ ?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



a)
A = {(rcosΦ,rsinΦ): r_0 ≤ r ≤ 1}
We have the conditions

U_rr + r^(-1)*U_r+r^(-2)*U_ΦΦ = 0 in A
U(1,Φ) = f(Φ)
U(r_0,Φ) = g(Φ)

Does not "the inner boundary is insulated" mean that \frac{\partial u}{\partial r} = 0 on r = r_0?

Φ"+v^2Φ = 0
ϑ^2R"+rR'-v^2R = 0

Φ => e^(ivΦ) , v= 0,+/-1, +/-2, ...

r = a)n*r^v+b_n*r^(-v)

Hence, u(r,Φ) = ∑ c_n * r^(|n|)*e^(inΦ)

Umm... no. I'm happy with assuming a solution of the form <br /> u(r,\phi) = \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty c_n R_n(r)e^{in\phi}<br /> where u(1,\phi) = f(\phi) = \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty c_ne^{in\phi} and the R_n are an as yet unspecified sequence of functions, but R_n = r^{|n|} is not the solution you are looking for as it doesn't satisfy the boundary condition on r = r_0.

We know that
C_n = 1/(2*pi) integral from -pi to pi f(Φ)e^(-inΦ)dΦ

u(r,Φ) = ∑C_n * ( (r^n+r_0^(2n)*r^(-n)) / (1+r_0^(2n)) * e^(inΦ))

That is the answer for part a. Finding the steady state temperature.

My question is how did we get to that messy r fraction part. We see what I stated r to equal, and we know cn is right based off Fourier coefficients

WE went from u(r,Φ) = ∑ c_n * r^(|n|)*e^(inΦ)
to u(r,Φ) = ∑C_n * ( (r^n+r_0^(2n)*r^(-n)) / (1+r_0^(2n)) * e^(inΦ))

If u(r,\phi) = \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty c_n R_n(r) e^{in\phi} and f(\phi) = \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty} c_ne^{in\phi} then R_n is the solution of the boundary value problem <br /> \frac{1}{r}\frac{d}{dr}\left(r\frac{dR_n}{dr}\right) - \frac{n^2 R_n}{r^2} = 0 subject to R_n(1) = 1 and R_n&#039;(r_0) = 0, obtained by substituting the series definition of u into Laplace's equation and considering the coefficients of e^{in\phi}.

Now there are two points to note:

(1) The BVP for n &gt; 0 is the same as that for -n &lt; 0 and therefore they have the same solution: R_n = R_{|n|}.

(2) The BVP for n = 0 is a special case.

Thus we have <br /> u(r,\phi) = c_0R_0(r) + \sum_{n=1}^\infty (c_n e^{in\phi} + c_{-n}e^{-in\phi}) R_n(r) which is easily rearranged into <br /> u(r,\phi) = c_0R_0(r) + \sum_{n=1}^\infty (a_n \cos n\phi + b_n \sin n\phi) R_n(r) if that's more convenient, and I'll let you go back and solve the BVPs for R_n for n \geq 0.

Must I use the Poisson Kernel?

b) b is a little tougher for me to understand.

answer is u(r,Φ) = 1+2*((r^2+r_0^2)/ (r(1+r_0^2))) sinΦ

I started off by analyzing the c_n by inputting f(Φ) = 1+2sinΦ
we get that the integral =
View attachment 97271

The Fourier series of 1 + 2 \sin \phi is, astoundingly, 1 + 2 \sin \phi. Substitute this into the general solution.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes RJLiberator
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top