Peanut-shaped near-Earth asteroid imaged by radar

  • Thread starter Thread starter Spinnor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Asteroid Radar
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the radar imaging of a peanut-shaped near-Earth asteroid, questioning why the brightest part of the image appears below the upper edges. Participants speculate that this could be due to the positioning of the radar emitter and receiver, which are not aligned directly with the asteroid. There is also a consideration of whether solar electromagnetic radiation might influence the radar readings. The shape of the asteroid is debated, with some suggesting it resembles a dumbbell rather than a peanut. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the complexities of radar imaging and the factors affecting the intensity of reflected signals.
Spinnor
Gold Member
Messages
2,227
Reaction score
419
Why is the brightest part of the asteroid radar image below the upper edges?

PIA19647_940x464.jpg


From,

http://astronomynow.com/2015/08/03/peanut-shaped-near-earth-asteroid-1999jd6-imaged-by-radar/

Is it a software effect? I would naively think that the greatest radar intensity would be reflected from the parts of the asteroid nearly perpendicular to our view. A Google image search shows a similar trend.

https://www.google.com/search?safe=...13.0...0...1ac.1.64.img..0.18.879.Clm93sqRtmU
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Well, for starters, the radar emitter and receiver are in different locations.
 
DaveC426913 said:
Well, for starters, the radar emitter and receiver are in different locations.

Right, but at the distance to the asteroid, the angle formed by the emitter, reflector, and absorber is nearly zero?
 
Yeah. It was a reach. :biggrin:

I'll bet that we are seeing solar EM radiation in the radar range.
 
  • Like
Likes RaulTheUCSCSlug
Looks more like a dumbbell then a peanut :biggrin: and well could it be due to something like a Doppler shift?

Edit: Nevermind I don't think it would make much sense since the radar emitter is the one emitting the rays, not the asteroid... right? Unless the asteroid is emitting radiation as well.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Back
Top