Period of Satellite's Orbital Motion Around Earth

  • Thread starter Thread starter Asla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Period Satellite
Asla
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An artificial satellite is traveling in a circular orbit around the earth.The radius of the orbit from the Earth's center is r.Assume that the Earth is a uniform sphere of radius R.The magnitude of acceleration due to gravity at the surface is g.What is the period of the satellites orbital motion?
a)2pi r/sqrt(gR)
b)2pi R/sqrt(gr)
c)2pi r/R sqrt(r/g)
d)2pi R/r sqrt(R/g)

I am thinking that the problem is somehow related to uniform circular motion but I hit my first problem while trying to get the centripetal acceleration that is acting on the satellite because the give gravitational force is supposed to be on the surface of the earth.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Asla said:
I hit my first problem while trying to get the centripetal acceleration that is acting on the satellite because the give gravitational force is supposed to be on the surface of the
earth.

How does the force of gravity change with distance?

So if the force of gravity on the surface of the earth, i.e. at distance R from the centre of the Earth is g, what is the force of gravity at distance r?
 
Yap I think that is the approach.Gravity acting on the satellite is R^2/r^2 (g) through which you get to (c) as the answer
 
That's it :smile:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top