Periodic motion -- Potential as a function of a non-linear Force(x)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the potential energy function derived from a non-linear force, specifically V = -9/x + 18/x^2. The participant grapples with the implications of negative total mechanical energy (e < 0) on the particle's motion and potential energy, noting that kinetic energy (KE) is always positive. They conclude that for the potential energy to remain negative, the position must be constrained to x > 2, which raises questions about the particle's ability to move towards infinity. The participant seeks clarification on how the particle can behave under these conditions, particularly with a negative total energy. Overall, the discussion highlights the complexities of periodic motion in the context of non-linear forces and potential energy.
davon806
Messages
147
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Please see the attached.I don't know how to do (ai).

potential function is the potential energy defined by f = -dV/dx
e is the total energy of the system where
e = KE + PE
= (dx/dt)^2 /2 + V

Note:m=1 because the particle has a unit mass
If you integrate f,you get V(the PE),which is -9/x + 18/x^2 :
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=+-+9/x+++18/x^2

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I actually sketched the graph as given on the above website,clearly if e is positive then V must be negative,which is shown on the graph when x--->infinity,this is the answer to part (aii).But for a(i) I have no idea,because I haven't met a negative total mechanical energy before.
What I thought is:
KE + V = -e
KE is always positive,leaving V = -e-KE,
This means PE is always negative,but from (aii) I show that V is negative if x--->infinity.In fact,
V = -9/x + 18/x^2 = (18-9x) / x^2.

i.e. V<0 if x>2

If this is the case then in V = -e-Ke we need to have x>2 all the time,which doesn't make sense.Moreover this is the answer to (aii),e>0

Would greatly appreciate if someone can give me an idea what's going on

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • periodic motion.jpg
    periodic motion.jpg
    12.9 KB · Views: 425
Physics news on Phys.org
For a given negative energy e<0, where can the particle be? Can it move to infinity? If not, how does its motion have to look like, e. g. if its initial motion is in positive x-direction?
davon806 said:
If this is the case then in V = -e-Ke we need to have x>2 all the time
True. Where is the problem?
 
thx
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top