Periodic Surface Waves Produced by Non-Periodic Disturbances

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between angular frequency, wavenumber, and phase velocity of periodic surface waves on deep water. The phase velocity is derived as Vp = sqrt(gλ/2π), linking it to the wavelength. A key point is how localized non-periodic disturbances can generate approximately periodic waves at the shore due to the phenomenon of dispersion. Waves of different wavelengths travel at different speeds, causing them to group together over time. This dispersion effect explains the emergence of periodic waves from initially non-periodic motion.
Caveman11
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
This is part of a past paper I am trying to work through before a physics of fluids exam in a month.The angular frequency ω of a periodic surface wave with wavenumber k on
deep water is
ω = sqrt(gk)
where g is the gravitational acceleration.
Obtain an expression for the wave’s phase velocity in terms of its wavelength
and explain how a localized non-periodic disturbance far out at sea can lead
to approximately periodic surface waves at the shore.
Relevant equations:

V_{p}=\frac{\omega}{k} (Phase Velocity)
3. The Attempt at a Solution : I obtained a value for V_{p} as:

V_{p}=\sqrt{\frac{g\lambda}{2\pi}}

Which I assume to be correct. However I can't explain the fact that you can get periodic waves from non-periodic motion. The only explanation I could think of was that the waves with the same wavelength travel together as they have the same phase velocity where as longer wavelength waves have a higher phase velocity and can overtake the slower ones. This would lead to after a while all the different periods being grouped together?Many Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. That's "dispersion" for ya!
 
I didn't expect it to be be that, Thanks
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top