dervast
- 132
- 1
Hi i am trying to frigure out the similarities and differences between permitivity and permeability? When do we use the one or another term?
The discussion revolves around the similarities and differences between permittivity and permeability, focusing on their definitions, applications, and the contexts in which each term is used. Participants explore both theoretical and practical aspects of these concepts in relation to electric and magnetic fields.
Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the definitions and implications of permittivity and permeability. There is no consensus on certain technical details, such as the nature of their values (scalar vs. tensor) and the interpretation of impedance in free space.
Some discussions involve assumptions about the definitions of terms and the context in which they are applied, particularly regarding relative versus absolute values. The discussion also touches on the mathematical relationships without resolving the underlying complexities.
This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in electromagnetism, physics students seeking clarification on fundamental concepts, and those exploring the applications of permittivity and permeability in various fields.
It's permiTTivity :)dervast said:Hi i am trying to frigure out the similarities and differences between permitivity and permeability? When do we use the one or another term?
Bob S said:The speed of light, 2.9979 x 108 meters / sec, is equal to the inverse square root of the product of e0 and u0. The impedance of free space, 377 ohms, is equal to the square root of the ratio of u0 / e0. Virtually every material has a dielectric constant and index of refraction > 1, both associated with e0, while very few materials have a relative permeability u > 1 (magnetic materials), associated with u0. e0 is associated with charge, while u0 is associated with currents.
Glen Bartusch said:Where did you get the idea that the impedance of "free space" is 377 Ohms?