Permitivity and Permeability: What's the Difference and When Do We Use Them?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dervast
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Permeability
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the similarities and differences between permittivity and permeability, focusing on their definitions, applications, and the contexts in which each term is used. Participants explore both theoretical and practical aspects of these concepts in relation to electric and magnetic fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that permittivity pertains to electric fields while permeability pertains to magnetic fields.
  • One participant mentions that permittivity is denoted as ε₀ and permeability as μ₀.
  • A later reply emphasizes the importance of discussing relative permittivity and permeability, noting that these terms refer to the properties of the vacuum.
  • Another participant explains that relative permittivity indicates how much electrical charge an object can store when a voltage is applied, relating it to the concept of dielectric constant.
  • Some participants discuss the mathematical relationships involving the speed of light and impedance of free space, with differing views on the implications of these relationships.
  • One participant claims that permittivity is a scalar while permeability is a tensor, which is contested by another who states both can be tensor-valued.
  • A participant seeks clarification on how these concepts relate to hydraulic flow rate.
  • There are multiple references to the impedance of free space, with some participants questioning its definition and implications.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the definitions and implications of permittivity and permeability. There is no consensus on certain technical details, such as the nature of their values (scalar vs. tensor) and the interpretation of impedance in free space.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions involve assumptions about the definitions of terms and the context in which they are applied, particularly regarding relative versus absolute values. The discussion also touches on the mathematical relationships without resolving the underlying complexities.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in electromagnetism, physics students seeking clarification on fundamental concepts, and those exploring the applications of permittivity and permeability in various fields.

dervast
Messages
132
Reaction score
1
Hi i am trying to frigure out the similarities and differences between permitivity and permeability? When do we use the one or another term?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Permitivity pertains to electric fields, and permeability pertains to magnetic fields. What textbook are you using for this anyway?
 
So its the same thing but the first term is for electricity and the second one for magneticity
 
permitivity is eo and permetabilty is m0 right?
 
dervast said:
Hi i am trying to frigure out the similarities and differences between permitivity and permeability? When do we use the one or another term?
It's permiTTivity :)

Although this is a very good question, you really should have asked about the RELATIVE permeability and permittivity.

Why ? Well, because the the "permeability and permittivity" are just the units or the "permeability and permittivity" of the vacuum. If one talks about relativity permittivity of 3.9, than one really means 3.9 times the permittivity of the vacuum.

Now, what are these guys ? Well, they are indeed quite similar since permittivity refers to "electrical phenomena" and permeability refers to "magnetic phenomena".

Let's take the (relative) permittivity. Basically, this quantity refers to how much electrical charge an object can store once you apply a voltage onto it. In other words, it expresses how an object "reacts" through rearrangement of the electronic distribution of the material, if you apply an E-field onto it. As an example, just think of what happens if you apply a voltage onto a medium with 5 plus and 5 minus charges. The charges will separate. There is another, more famous quantity that expresses this : ie the dielectric constant. This actually is the relative permittivity of a dielectric (ie a polarizable medium).

The exact same thing exists for magnetic media. Keep in mind that the electrons are NOT represented by magnetic monopoles ! This is the only assymetry between electrical and magnetic phenomena.

regards
marlon
 
One thing that separates the two is that permittivity is a scalar and permeability is a tensor.
 
That's not true- both the permittivity and permeability may be tensor-valued.
 
The speed of light, 2.9979 x 108 meters / sec, is equal to the inverse square root of the product of e0 and u0. The impedance of free space, 377 ohms, is equal to the square root of the ratio of u0 / e0. Virtually every material has a dielectric constant and index of refraction > 1, both associated with e0, while very few materials have a relative permeability u > 1 (magnetic materials), associated with u0. e0 is associated with charge, while u0 is associated with currents.
 
Can someone help me to know the same difference but referred to hydraulic flow rate? thanks!
 
  • #10
Bob S said:
The speed of light, 2.9979 x 108 meters / sec, is equal to the inverse square root of the product of e0 and u0. The impedance of free space, 377 ohms, is equal to the square root of the ratio of u0 / e0. Virtually every material has a dielectric constant and index of refraction > 1, both associated with e0, while very few materials have a relative permeability u > 1 (magnetic materials), associated with u0. e0 is associated with charge, while u0 is associated with currents.

Where did you get the idea that the impedance of "free space" is 377 Ohms? Since impedance is defined as "the total resistance in [any] circuit," that would mean that the impedance of free space would exceed several million Ohms, provided my DVM probes aren't so close together that they electrically short.
 
  • #11
Think of permittivity and permeability as "bang for your buck" constants. That is, how much E or B field you get for a given amount of charge at some velocity, v. Permittivity applies to E fields, permeability applies to B fields.

P.S. Glen, Bob S. is correct, the impedance of free space is ~377 ohms.

Claude.
 
  • #12
Glen Bartusch said:
Where did you get the idea that the impedance of "free space" is 377 Ohms?

From e.g. any book which includes a chapter on basic antenna theory.
And the 377 Ohms of space can "short" a circuit when you are working at high frequencies, so it is a "proper" impedance;
 
  • #13
How we calculate permitivity and permeability of free space?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K