Permutations .How do u find the number of paths in a 3D object?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gillgill
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    3d Permutations
AI Thread Summary
To find the number of paths in a 3D object like a cube, one can use the same distance formula as in 2D, which is the square root of the sum of the squares of the coordinates. The key factor is the number of nodes and their interconnections, rather than the dimensionality of the object. A 3D cube can be represented in 2D, allowing for path calculations without losing accuracy. However, counting paths becomes feasible only in a lattice coordinate system where points are defined at integer coordinates. Clarification is needed if the discussion pertains to general paths or specific lattice paths.
gillgill
Messages
128
Reaction score
0
Permutations...
How do u find the number of paths in a 3D object?...let say a cube...from A to B...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand?

maby you want the distance from A to B in 3D? Its the same formula as in 2D just an extra variable
squareroot(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)

assuming B is relative to A and those are B's cooridinates to A.

Hope this helps!
 
gillgill,
It doesn't matter whether the object is 3D or 2D. What does matter is how many nodes and how are their interconnections. You can draw a 3D cube in a 2D way and calculate the number of paths from A to B without affecting anything. (All u have to make sure that u are representing every edge of 3D object in 2D diagram)

-- AI
 
how do u know how to draw it in 2D?...and from which point to which point?
 
I'm also not sure where you're going with all of this. There's an infinite amount of paths between any two points in R^3, same thing with R^2. If you're talking about like, a lattice coordinate plane, this is different. A lattice coordinate plane only has "points" at integers, so it's actually feasible to count the number of paths between two points in a cube that is set in the lattice plane. If this is what you want (or if it isn't), please clarify.
 
...*--------*
../|... /|
./.|.../.|
*--------*..|
|..|...|..|
|..*------|--*
|./...|./
|/...|/
*--------*

Above i represent a cube in 2D (albeit in a very shabby way), but u would see that i have done 2D representation of the 3D cube and each node of the cube and each edge of the cube can be uniquely mapped to this figure.

-- AI
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top