Perpendicularity on complex vector space

mnb96
Messages
711
Reaction score
5
Hi,
given a complex vector space with a hermitian inner product, how is the cosine of the angle between two vectors defined?
I tried to follow a similar reasoning as in the real case and I got the following:

cos(\theta)=\mathcal{R}e \frac{ \left\langle u,v\right\rangle}{\left\|u\right\| \left\|v\right\|}

Does this make any sense?
If that is correct it means two vectors are perpendicular whenever the real part of their hermitian inner product is zero.

Again, if that is correct, how can we compute the projection of one vector onto another?
Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem with your definition is that orthogonality would only involve the real part of the inner product. A more useful definition of angle would be

cos(\theta)= \frac{ \left|\left\langle u,v\right\rangle\right|}{\left\|u\right\| \left\|v\right\|}
 
Last edited:
One way to define it is as the smallest of the angles \theta that makes the expression:

\frac{\left\langle U,V \right\rangle}{\left\| U\right\| \left\| V \right\|}e^{i\theta}

A real number.
 
I see.
it seems the definition of angle for complex vector spaces is quite arbitrary!
Aren't you aware of any of these definitions which is more "meaningful" than others? For example one that has been used in physics or has found some application?

I came up to that definition by starting from the law of cosines for triangles which says:

c^2=a^2+b^2-2abcos(\theta)

so ones has:

|c|^2=<a-b,a-b>=|a|^2+|b|^2-(<a,b>+<b,a>)

which implies that:

\frac{1}{2}(<a,b>+<b,a>)=\mathcal{R}e<a,b>=abcos(\theta)

What is the geometric reasoning behind the other definitions you are suggesting?
 
The standard definition for real vector spaces is

\cos\theta=\frac{\langle x,y\rangle}{\|x\|\|y\|}

(No absolute value in the numerator). I don't think there is a useful definition for complex vector spaces. But x and y are still said to be orthogonal if <x,y>=0.
 
The geometric reasoning behind the definition I gave (and that is sometimes used in signal processing), is a generalization of the situation in C (considered as a vector space): if you have two complex numbers with unit modulus, then \theta is the rotation angle that takes their product to the real axis.
But Fredrik is also correct: in complex vector spaces (with inner product, of course), orthogonality can always be defined, while angle is somewhat arbitrary.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top