Perturbation Theory - First Order Approximation

Sunnyocean
Messages
72
Reaction score
6
If:

##\hat{H} \psi (x) = E \psi (x)##

where E is the eigenvalue of the *disturbed* eigenfunction ##\psi (x)##

and ##E_n## are the eigenvalues of the *undisturbed* Hamiltonian ##\hat{H_0}##

and the *disturbed* Hamiltonian is of the form:

##\hat{H} = \hat{H_0} +{\epsilon} \hat{V} ##

where ## \hat{V} ## is the potential and

then we can expand, using a Taylor expansion, ##\psi (x) ## and ##\epsilon## is a very small (positive?) number

##\psi (x) = {\psi}_0 (x) + {\epsilon}{\psi}_1 (x) + {\epsilon}^2 {\psi}_2 (x) + ... ## (1)

where ##{\psi}_k (x)## is the eigenfunction of ##\hat{H}## corresponding to the eigenvalue ##E_n## (eigenvalues are assumed to be non-degenerate)

We also get, using a Taylor expansion:

##E = E_0 +{\epsilon}{E_1} + {\epsilon}^2 {E_2} + ...## (2)

MY QUESTIONS:

I tried deriving formulae (1) and (2) - i.e. the expansions - on my own but I was unable to do it. Could anyone please show me *in detail* how to obtain those expansions?

Another question is:
How do we know that, when using the Taylor expansion, the coefficient ## {\epsilon} ## applies to ##{\psi}_1 (x)## and not to some other eigenfuncion, the coefficient ## {\epsilon}^2 ## applies to ##{\psi}_2 (x)## and not to some other eigenfuncion, and so on? The same question for eigenvalues.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sunnyocean said:
Another question is:
How do we know that, when using the Taylor expansion, the coefficient ## {\epsilon} ## applies to ##{\psi}_1 (x)## and not to some other eigenfuncion, the coefficient ## {\epsilon}^2 ## applies to ##{\psi}_2 (x)## and not to some other eigenfuncion, and so on? The same question for eigenvalues.

##E^{(n)}## is *defined* as the coefficient of ##\epsilon^n## in the power series expansion of ##E##. Same for ##\psi^{(n)}##.

Note that the ##E^{(n)}##'s and ##\psi^{(n)}##'s are *not* eigenvalues and eigenfunctions, except for ##E^{(0)}## and ##\psi^{(0)}## which are an eigenvalue and eigenfunction of ##H_0##.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thank you The_Duck, that clarifies it. I was obviously misled by the confusing notation. You made it clear, so thank you again :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top