Perturbed in the harmonic oscillator

Fatimah od
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



486987655.png


Homework Equations



289028545.png


The Attempt at a Solution



for part a I do not know how to write it in power series form ?

for part b :
I chose the perturbed H' is v(x)= (1+ε )K x^2 /2
then I started integrate E_1 = ∫ H' ψ^2 dx

the problem was , the result equals to ∞ !

shall I integrate in the interval [ 0,∞ ] !
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Fatimah od said:
for part a I do not know how to write it in power series form ?

You are given E_n = (n + \frac12)\hbar\sqrt{k/m}. k is now k(1+\epsilon), so E_n is now
<br /> E_n = \left(n + \frac12\right)\hbar\sqrt{\frac km(1 + \epsilon)} = <br /> \left(n + \frac12\right)\hbar\sqrt{\frac km}(1 + \epsilon)^{1/2}<br />
Since |\epsilon| &lt; 1, (1 + \epsilon)^{1/2} can be expanded in a binomial series.
 
ok , I do it thanks

any help for second part please
 
Fatimah od said:
ok , I do it thanks

any help for second part please

I can't help you with that unless you tell me how your textbook defines H&#039;, E_n^1 and \psi_n^0. I am prepared to guess that you have
E_n = E_n^0 + \epsilon E_n^1 + O(\epsilon^2)\\<br /> \psi_n = \psi_n^0 +\epsilon\psi_n^1 + O(\epsilon^2)
but I'm not prepared to guess what H&#039; might be. However I suspect the method is to substitute the above into the Schrodinger equation to get
<br /> (E_n^0 + \epsilon E_n^1)(\psi_n^0 + \epsilon \psi_n^1) = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\mathrm{d}^2}{\mathrm{d}x^2} (\psi_n^0 + \epsilon\psi_n^1) + \frac{kx^2}{2}(1 + \epsilon)(\psi_n^0 +\epsilon\psi_n^1)<br />
and then require that the coefficients of \epsilon^0 and \epsilon^1 should vanish. At some stage you may want to take an inner product with \langle\psi_n^0|, and recall that
H_0 = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\mathrm{d}^2}{\mathrm{d}x^2} + \frac{kx^2}{2}
is self-adjoint (\langle f | H_0 | g \rangle = \langle g | H_0 | f \rangle for all f and g).
 
Your H' is wrong, or you're not expressing yourself clearly. H' is the difference between the complete Hamiltonian and the unperturbed Hamiltonian.

Show us how you're getting that the integral diverges. The problem seems to lie in your evaluation of the integral.
 
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top