Perturbed in the harmonic oscillator

Fatimah od
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



486987655.png


Homework Equations



289028545.png


The Attempt at a Solution



for part a I do not know how to write it in power series form ?

for part b :
I chose the perturbed H' is v(x)= (1+ε )K x^2 /2
then I started integrate E_1 = ∫ H' ψ^2 dx

the problem was , the result equals to ∞ !

shall I integrate in the interval [ 0,∞ ] !
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Fatimah od said:
for part a I do not know how to write it in power series form ?

You are given E_n = (n + \frac12)\hbar\sqrt{k/m}. k is now k(1+\epsilon), so E_n is now
<br /> E_n = \left(n + \frac12\right)\hbar\sqrt{\frac km(1 + \epsilon)} = <br /> \left(n + \frac12\right)\hbar\sqrt{\frac km}(1 + \epsilon)^{1/2}<br />
Since |\epsilon| &lt; 1, (1 + \epsilon)^{1/2} can be expanded in a binomial series.
 
ok , I do it thanks

any help for second part please
 
Fatimah od said:
ok , I do it thanks

any help for second part please

I can't help you with that unless you tell me how your textbook defines H&#039;, E_n^1 and \psi_n^0. I am prepared to guess that you have
E_n = E_n^0 + \epsilon E_n^1 + O(\epsilon^2)\\<br /> \psi_n = \psi_n^0 +\epsilon\psi_n^1 + O(\epsilon^2)
but I'm not prepared to guess what H&#039; might be. However I suspect the method is to substitute the above into the Schrodinger equation to get
<br /> (E_n^0 + \epsilon E_n^1)(\psi_n^0 + \epsilon \psi_n^1) = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\mathrm{d}^2}{\mathrm{d}x^2} (\psi_n^0 + \epsilon\psi_n^1) + \frac{kx^2}{2}(1 + \epsilon)(\psi_n^0 +\epsilon\psi_n^1)<br />
and then require that the coefficients of \epsilon^0 and \epsilon^1 should vanish. At some stage you may want to take an inner product with \langle\psi_n^0|, and recall that
H_0 = -\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\mathrm{d}^2}{\mathrm{d}x^2} + \frac{kx^2}{2}
is self-adjoint (\langle f | H_0 | g \rangle = \langle g | H_0 | f \rangle for all f and g).
 
Your H' is wrong, or you're not expressing yourself clearly. H' is the difference between the complete Hamiltonian and the unperturbed Hamiltonian.

Show us how you're getting that the integral diverges. The problem seems to lie in your evaluation of the integral.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top