Phase detector for PLL with low SNR

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges of designing a phase detector for a Phase-Locked Loop (PLL) system that operates effectively with low signal-to-noise ratios (SNR). Participants explore various aspects of the system, including the nature of the signals, the stability of the phase at resonance, and potential methods for improving detection in noisy environments.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks advice on designing a phase detector that can function with very low amplitude signals that are obscured by noise.
  • Another participant asks for clarification on whether the signals are digital or analog, and what is meant by "low signal" in terms of phase error versus amplitude.
  • A participant describes the application as measuring surface potential with a vibrating probe, emphasizing that the PLL circuit is used to adjust frequency to a resonance, which leads to unstable phase conditions.
  • One suggestion involves using two synchronous detectors with a 90-degree phase difference for I & Q demodulation, which could help in minimizing noise effects.
  • Some participants express confusion regarding the stability of phase at resonance, questioning the expected gain of the feedback loop and suggesting the need for amplification and filtering to improve signal detection.
  • Concerns are raised about the lecturer's statement regarding minimal gain at resonance, with requests for further clarification on the setup and the nature of the signal generation.
  • One participant questions the necessity of using a PLL for the application, suggesting that a simple signal generator might suffice for stimulating a resonant device.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the stability of phase at resonance and the effectiveness of the PLL in this context. There is no consensus on the best approach to address the low SNR issue, and several competing ideas are presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential need for amplifiers and filters to enhance the signal before phase locking, as well as the implications of the resonant frequency on phase stability. There are unresolved questions about the specific setup and the definitions of key terms used in the discussion.

C12H17
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I'm making a system with PLL. Here's more or less a principal scheme. What happens here is that the signal in this compensating system becomes really low and phase detector might not work properly. What I want to ask, what type or how to make a phase detector which can detect phase correctly from a very low signal. Any scheme idea?
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    9.3 KB · Views: 643
Engineering news on Phys.org
Interesting!

Can you supply some more detail? Are the signals digital or analog? When you say "low signal" do you mean you wish to detect very small phase error, or that the amplitude of the signal is small.
 
Last edited:
The system's purpose is to measure a surface potencial with vibrating zond of a material. The signal is analog and measured with voltmeter. PLL circuit is used to automatically adjust frequency to a resonance f. Because frequency is at resonance the phase is very unstable. By saying low signal I mean the amplitude is small and it kinda dissapears in the noise which makes it hard to detect. Any particular questions?
 
Why don't you use the output of your generator to drive two synchronous detectors but maintain a phase difference between the generator inputs to the two synchronous detectors of 90 deg? This is typically referred to as I & Q demodulation.

You would take the analog outputs of both synchronous detectors, square the values and add them together. The sum represents the amplitude of your signal. Note that this method works even if neither phase from the generator is in phase with your signal. The effect of noise can be minimized by the use of a low pass filter on the output.

To accomplish the squaring function you can either use A/D converters to convert to digital values which you square and then either convert back to analog or use the digital values. Or you can use an analog multiplier such as the AD633ANZ to square the analog values directly.

If you look around you may be able to find ICs that do the I & Q demodulation for you.
 
Last edited:
C12H17 said:
The system's purpose is to measure a surface potencial with vibrating zond of a material. The signal is analog and measured with voltmeter. PLL circuit is used to automatically adjust frequency to a resonance f. Because frequency is at resonance the phase is very unstable. By saying low signal I mean the amplitude is small and it kinda dissapears in the noise which makes it hard to detect. Any particular questions?
This doesn't make sense to me. Since the slope dphi/df is maximal on resonance, doesn't your feedback loop have maximal gain there? I'd expect best stability on resonance.
 
I have to say I'm a little confused as well. The phase should be fairly stable at resonance if the Q is decent. At the very least, it sounds like you're going to need an amplifier with a bandpass filter to get enough signal to drive your phase detector.
 
any small frequency deviation from the resonance makes a phase to change from +90 to -90. So I need f to be stable at resonance and phase to be stable. My lecturer said that the gain will be minimal.
Honestly, I have no idea what I'm doing here.
 
C12H17 said:
any small frequency deviation from the resonance makes a phase to change from +90 to -90.
Phase with respect to what - your generator?

So I need f to be stable at resonance and phase to be stable. My lecturer said that the gain will be minimal.
How is f created? If you have a pickup, what kind of pick up is it? Are you able to amplify and filter f before you try to phase lock to it?

Can you clarify why your instructor instructor said gain will be minimal? Can you give us a better description of your setup?
 
C12H17 said:
any small frequency deviation from the resonance makes a phase to change from +90 to -90. So I need f to be stable at resonance and phase to be stable. My lecturer said that the gain will be minimal.
Honestly, I have no idea what I'm doing here.


That sort of phase shift around resonance is typical. The swing thru zero is what marks the resonant frequency.
 
  • #10
I have to ask, why are you using a PLL for this? If all you want is to provide stimulation to a resonant device, all you need is a simple signal generator tuned to the resonant frequency.
 

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
Replies
26
Views
5K