Phonon Condensation in Solids: Sources for Research

fresnelspot
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hi , i need some scientific source (book, article etc.) on phonon condensation in solids. Google scholar seems to fail in this topic. Can anyone advice me some source ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm...interesting topic. I found this:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6TVM-4BDW08X-8&_user=10&_coverDate=02%2F16%2F2004&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=dee0fb7893161415bad97ba213d91e56

Also, there's such a thing as phonon localization:
http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PRB/v48/i16/p12151_1
 
I can not understand what phonon condensation means

Atoms can condense to a single wavefunction because they are conserved, but phonon and photon are not conserved!

If you lower the temperature of a solid to zero, the number of phonons decrease monotonically and vanishes identically at zero temperature, how can there be a phonon condensate?
 
wdlang said:
I can not understand what phonon condensation means

Atoms can condense to a single wavefunction because they are conserved, but phonon and photon are not conserved!
The number of atoms in the condensate is itself not conserved. Besides, at a given temperature isn't the total phonon density conserved too? In any case, I'm not aware of the need for total particle number conservation.

If you lower the temperature of a solid to zero, the number of phonons decrease monotonically and vanishes identically at zero temperature, how can there be a phonon condensate?
This does not preclude the possibility of a phonon condensate at T>0. Keep in mind also, that the common method of cooling alkali atoms in traps necessarily results in the total particle number decreasing monotonically with temperature, and vanishing at T=0.

Also, in addition to all this, you need to keep in mind that most atomic BECs are only quasi-equilibrium systems (conservation rules apply over not-too-long time scales).
 
Last edited:
Gokul43201 said:
The number of atoms in the condensate is itself not conserved. Besides, at a given temperature isn't the total phonon density conserved too? In any case, I'm not aware of the need for total particle number conservation.

The atoms in the condensate is not conserved, but the total number of atoms is conserved. BEC occurs because the excitation levels can not accommodate the whole of the atoms, so the remaining atoms have to reside in the ground state. In this argument, it is quite clear that atom conservation is necessary for the occurence of BEC.

Gokul43201 said:
This does not preclude the possibility of a phonon condensate at T>0. Keep in mind also, that the common method of cooling alkali atoms in traps necessarily results in the total particle number decreasing monotonically with temperature, and vanishing at T=0.

but in priciple, we can avoid the atom-loss and keep the number of atoms a constant.
 
In fact, the paper posted above talks about non-equilibrium state of phonons

My view-point is that, there is no phonon condensate at equilibrium
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top