Photoelectric effect and mercury

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the photoelectric effect, specifically concerning mercury when illuminated with UV light at a wavelength of 300 nm, compared to its cutoff wavelength of 250 nm.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between wavelength, frequency, and energy in the context of the photoelectric effect. Questions arise about the implications of the given cutoff wavelength and how it relates to the energy of the incident light.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided reasoning regarding the energy of the light in relation to the cutoff wavelength, suggesting that since the wavelength of the incident light is longer than the cutoff, it would result in lower energy, thus indicating that the photoelectric effect would not occur. However, there is no explicit consensus on the interpretation of the initial problem.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes uncertainty regarding the work function and frequency, indicating a potential gap in information necessary for a complete analysis.

stickplot
Messages
83
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a. Does the photoelectric effect take place if mercury is illuminated with UV light with a wavelength λ = 300 nm? The cutoff wavelength for mercury is 250 nm.


Homework Equations



ft= WF/h(planks constant)
E=h(f)

The Attempt at a Solution



im not sure how to start this because the work function is not given and neither is the frequency i know that i can get the work function if i have the frequency by multiplying it with planks constant, but I am not sure how to get it with just the wavelength.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are given the cut off wavelength, and wavelength and frequency are related.
But you don't need to calculate anything - just a bit of reasoning.

Your light is longer wavelength than the cut off, is this higher or lower energy?
Which would it have to be to eject an electron?
 
o ok, so this means that the energy is lower because the frequency would be lower, so photoelectric effect would not take place. is that right?
 
Correct, longer wavelength = lower frequency = lower energy
So no emmission
 
alright thanks
 
How would you calculate the cutoff frequency of an x-ray tube operating at 44kV? I am using frequency = work function/h. I have (44000eV x 1.602E-19J)/1.626E-34 but my answer is wrong. I'm thinking that I converted kV to eV incorrectly, but I'm not sure.
Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K