Photoelectric effect & your home

accountkiller
Messages
118
Reaction score
0
If the photoelectric effect causes light to knock electrons out of metals, why don't the metal surfaces in our home lose electrons when we turn on the light?

I'm a third-year college student. This question was a discussion question in the back of the chapter, and I thought it was a great question but I have no idea what the explanation is.

Why is it that metals at home don't lose their electrons because of our light?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why don't you start by asking why don't the metal, which act as a photocathode, in a standard photoelectric effect experiment, lose electrons? After all, if anything will clearly lose electrons, that photocathode will.

Upon closer examination of the circuit, one will realize that the photocathode tends to be grounded. This means that it has a plentiful supply of electrons, preventing a charging effect.

Now, take a lot at the metals in your home. These metals, especially those connected to your appliances, or large large metal objects, are typically either grounded or connected to some other large objects that will ground it.

Or, the light source that you are using may not have enough energy to cause a photoemission, if the work function is too high. After all, metals like copper has a work function of around 4.7 eV. This is in the UV range, way higher than your typical visible light energy.

Zz.
 
mbradar2 said:
If the photoelectric effect causes light to knock electrons out of metals, why don't the metal surfaces in our home lose electrons when we turn on the light?

I'm a third-year college student. This question was a discussion question in the back of the chapter, and I thought it was a great question but I have no idea what the explanation is.

Why is it that metals at home don't lose their electrons because of our light?

They do lose electrons.
 
Upisoft said:
They do lose electrons.

And the surface normally has air around it so any lost electrons are quickly replaced.
 
Zz, I'm not sure what you mean by the metal being grounded and "uncharged" as a reason for why the electrons aren't lost... even if the metal is grounded, the light still evokes the electron out, does it not?

Upisoft & NobodySpecial, that is the theory my dad came up with to try to explain to me - that as soon as the electrons escape by photoemission, they are immediately drawn back in, so it's like a never-ending process. Why are they immediately drawn back in? Is it because the light doesn't give it too much kinetic energy to escape any farther than just right above the surface?

NobodySpecial, how does the air interact with the electrons to make them go back to the metal?
 
mbradar2 said:
Zz, I'm not sure what you mean by the metal being grounded and "uncharged" as a reason for why the electrons aren't lost... even if the metal is grounded, the light still evokes the electron out, does it not?
When a metal is grounded the Earth itself acts as huge source of electrons. So in this case Earth successfully gains small positive charge. Even if this happens a lot you will see no big charge in the metal object.

mbradar2 said:
Upisoft & NobodySpecial, that is the theory my dad came up with to try to explain to me - that as soon as the electrons escape by photoemission, they are immediately drawn back in, so it's like a never-ending process. Why are they immediately drawn back in? Is it because the light doesn't give it too much kinetic energy to escape any farther than just right above the surface?
I think that both cases are possible. If electron returns it will do that because the Earth(and the metal object) are positively charged compared to the atmosphere. In the second case the electron will probably find positive ion in the atmosphere and recombine.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top