Photon Associated with Electromagnetic Wave

  • Thread starter Thread starter bernhard.rothenstein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photon
bernhard.rothenstein
Messages
991
Reaction score
1
Please let me know how would you characterize a photon associated to an electromagnetic wave propagating with u<c through a dielectric.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd characterize it as a photon that was constantly being absorbed and re-emitted.

The interesting part is how with a perfectly regular crystal structure you can have transparent materials that refract light. This involves some tricky aspects of superpositions of states that are not classical when treated in a quantum manner, i.e. with photons.
 
Last edited:
It is a stretch to assume it is the same photon.
An absorbed photon is gone forever.
 
i thought i remember reading on these very pages that this absorbtion and re-emmision is not what is happening in a transparent material. this was in the context of why light is slower in something that is not vacuum.

EDIT: actually, it wasn't these pages, but wikipedia:

It is sometimes claimed that light is slowed on its passage through a block of media by being absorbed and re-emitted by the atoms, only traveling at full speed through the vacuum between atoms. This explanation is incorrect and runs into problems if you try to use it to explain the details of refraction beyond the simple slowing of the signal.

Classically, considering electromagnetic radiation to be like a wave, the charges of each atom (primarily the electrons) interfere with the electric and magnetic fields of the radiation, slowing its progress.

The full quantum-mechanical explanation is essentially the same, but has to cope with the discrete particle nature (see Photons in matter): The E-field creates phonons in the media, and the photons mix with the phonons. The resulting mixture, called a polariton, travels with a speed different from light.
...

Light that travels through transparent matter does so at a lower speed than c, the speed of light in a vacuum. For example, photons suffer so many collisions on the way from the core of the sun that radiant energy can take years to reach the surface; however, once in open space, a photon only takes 8.3 minutes to reach Earth. The factor by which the speed is decreased is called the refractive index of the material. In a classical wave picture, the slowing can be explained by the light inducing electric polarization in the matter, the polarized matter radiating new light, and the new light interfering with the original light wave to form a delayed wave. In a particle picture, the slowing can instead be described as a blending of the photon with quantum excitations of the matter (quasi-particles such as phonons and excitons) to form a polariton; this polariton has a nonzero effective mass, which means that it cannot travel at c. Light of different frequencies may travel through matter at different speeds; this is called dispersion. The polariton propagation speed v equals its group velocity, which is the derivative of the energy with respect to momentum.

i don't know who's right, and am not worried about it. but I'm curious.
 
Last edited:
Zapperz is the best person to ask, though I think he's written it down in the FAQ and is a bit tired of repeating himself. I suppose I ought to go re-read the FAQ myself.
 
does hf work in the medium?

pervect said:
Zapperz is the best person to ask, though I think he's written it down in the FAQ and is a bit tired of repeating himself. I suppose I ought to go re-read the FAQ myself.
I extend my question. Does hf work in the medium?
 
OK, I found the FAQ entry, https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=899393&postcount=4

And since ZapperZ agrees with the Wikipedia entry, it's probably right and I'm probably wrong.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
hf in the e.m. wave propagating through a medium

pervect said:
OK, I found the FAQ entry, https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=899393&postcount=4

Without beingt interested in the mechanism which slows down the propagation of the e.m. wave, we could consider that a Doppler effect could take place, the equation which accounts for it relating the frequencies detected by two observers relative to whom the wave propagates with u and u' respectively the relative velocity of the two observers being V, which could exceed u and u'. Under such conditions f and f' (the frequencies detected by the two observers) are related by a Doppler shift formulas simillar to those we find in the case of a mechanical wave related by a Doppler factor D which depends on u(u'), c (because of the clock sybchronization) and V. Do the equations hf=hf'D work?
Consider please that what I say is a question and not a statement.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm not quite sure what you are asking. In SR in a vacuum, the doppler shift factor will depend only on the velocity of the two observers relative to each other - in this case, the doppler shift factor will depend on the speed of each observer relative to the medium.
 
  • #10
e.m. wave through a medium

pervect said:
I'm not quite sure what you are asking. In SR in a vacuum, the doppler shift factor will depend only on the velocity of the two observers relative to each other - in this case, the doppler shift factor will depend on the speed of each observer relative to the medium.
Thanks. You understood exactly my question. I think that only in your reply should be extended as: The Doppler shift factor depends in that case on the relative velocity of the two involved observers, on the velocity at which the wave propagates relative to the two observers and on c, due to the fact that in both reference frames clock synchronization is performed. From that point of view the Doppler shift formula should have, in the case of the longitudinal case, the same algebraic structure as the Doppler shift formula in the case of an acoustic wave has. My problem is that if in the case of the e.m. wave propagating through the medium, the frequencies f and f' detected by the two observers are related by
hf=hf'D
D being the corresponding Doppler factor?
Regards and thanks
Bernhard
 

Similar threads

Back
Top