Photons and the Uncertainty Principle

Qbit42
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Using the meager physics knowledge I've scrapped together over my 19 year life span I've arrived at the following conundrum. It's more than likely that I'm entirely wrong, but I'd like to know why. Anyways here it goes.

First let me unviel my understanding of the universe, limited though it may be. Elementary particles exibit an phenomenon known as the uncertainty principal, which goes something like
(delta)x(delta)p = h/4(pie). A photon is one such elemetary particle. As far as my understanding of photons goes they are quantized bundles of light energy, which to me suggests that it would travel at the speed of light. It has been well established that the speed of light is constant for any particular medium. So my question is, if the speed of light is always a constant, that would mean that (delta)p is 0, making (delta)x infinity. This makes little sense to me since that would make it neigh impossible to ever find a photon. Also it would give rise to the following paradox. Since the speed of light varies in different substances, and the universe is not a homogeneous mixture of substances, we could never tell which substance a photon is actually traveling though (due to (delta)x being infinity). Since we can't tell what substance it is traveling though, we cannot say what its momentum truly is. Yet this uncertainty in momentum would allow (delta)x to come down from infinity, making it possible to discover which material the photon is in, thus allowing the momentum to be calculated precisely If the momentum is claculated precisely, then (delta)x again rises to infinity. You can see the paradox present here. Can someone please shed some light on this for me, no pun intended. :-p
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are incorrect in stating that the momentum is definitely known. The momentum of a photon has nothing to do with its velocity; it is directly proportional to the frequency.
 
You are incorrect in stating that the momentum is definitely known. The momentum of a photon has nothing to do with its velocity; it is directly proportional to the frequency.

Oh really? Thanks!
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top