Physical forces of a space collision

AI Thread Summary
A collision between a metal spaceship and a cold, atmosphere-less asteroid or moon would generate significant heat due to the kinetic energy involved. The lack of atmosphere means that energy cannot dissipate as sound, leading to increased temperatures from the impact. The potential for the spaceship to melt or fuse with the asteroid depends on the size and velocity of the ship. Friction during the collision could contribute to this heating effect. Overall, the physical forces at play could result in the ship experiencing severe thermal damage.
ElNarin
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody!

I've a question concerning the physical forces that would occur when a huge object (let's say a metal space ship) collides with an asteroid or a small moon (cold and without atmosphere). Is there any chance that the friction that would occur could melt the ship? Or would the space temperature cool it down?

Thanks!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
wow seems to your question seems to you a wonderful and very clever
I will try to look for the answer to your question
But can the response to my question
What is the difference between energy and force?
Maybe a stupid question, but the reason I held
 
Well I've to confess that I'm not so sure. I'd say the force is the acceleration of the object (the kinetic energy).
 
Obviously, the amount of energy released is going to be dependent on the size of the ship and it's velocity with respect to the asteroid or moon, but yes, heat will be a large factor in the collision. With no atmosphere to carry energy away as sound, most of the energy will go into heating up both the material of the ship and the moon/asteroid. So, if the ship is large enough or going fast enough, it is possible that the ship would melt and literally fuse into the asteroid.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top