Physicists build world's smallest motor Berkeley News

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the development of the smallest synthetic motor, as highlighted by Alex Zettl, a professor at UC Berkeley. He notes that while synthetic motors are advancing, biological motors still hold a slight edge in size. The conversation then shifts to the concept of large engines, with participants expressing skepticism about the performance of a specific large engine mentioned. There are calculations presented regarding horsepower per ton, with a comparison made between a large engine's output and a hypothetical scenario involving multiple GSX-R 750 turbo motorcycles, emphasizing the potential for higher horsepower and a more appealing sound. Overall, the dialogue reflects a blend of fascination with advancements in synthetic motors and a playful critique of large engine performance.
Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
8,194
Reaction score
2,429
"It's the smallest synthetic motor that's ever been made," said Alex Zettl, professor of physics at UC Berkeley and faculty scientist at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. "Nature is still a little bit ahead of us - there are biological motors that are equal or slightly smaller in size - but we are catching up."

Animated image available for download

http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2003/07/23_motor.shtml
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what will they think of next?!? the world's largest engine?
http://www.jerry-howell.com/12-Cylinder.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
wow that engine is really bad. (the big one)

100,000 bhp may seem a lot, but that's only 50 bhp per ton!

2000 tonns of GSX-R 750 turbo's would make 500,000 bhp. (at 200 bhp per ton) plus would sound cooler.

i think my calculations are correct. feel free to say other wise.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
99
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
7K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Back
Top