Physics 218 - Volume 1 - Mechanics Introduction Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a new member seeking help with understanding the line integral related to the Work-Energy Theorem in their Physics 218 course. They are preparing for a final exam that covers Kinematics, Work-Energy, and Conservation principles, and are specifically confused about how the integral of force over distance translates to total work done. The member expresses familiarity with kinetic and potential energy equations but struggles with the concept of anti-derivatives in this context. Other users suggest reviewing tutorials and posting specific questions to clarify their understanding. The conversation emphasizes the importance of detailed inquiries for effective assistance in complex physics topics.
lostdaytomorrow
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hey there fellas, I just joined this board yesterday. I'm a "Vet" over at Bodybuilding.com, so I'm aware of how boards work, just so you understand I'm not just joining the site and making a new thread.
I've gone through all of the archives and read through the threads that seem to be about what I am learning in this course, F=ma, and the W.E.T. and Conserv. of Energy, and Conserv. of Momentum. So far, I haven't really found many threads that seem to have any relevance to what I am trying to learn. Our comprehensive final is worth 40% of our GPR so I plan on making this site my new home for the new 5 weeks or so for sure.
Now, after that great narrative, here is my conundrum (trying to sounds like a smart kid). The exam I will be taking this Wednesday will be mainly over Kinematics, Work-Energy Theorem, Conservation of Energy, and Conservation of Momentum. We don't get to any circular motion until after this exam. I am having a lot of trouble understand the line integral when defining the Work of the Forces on a particle. I have no idea how to put the equations in this post, so I will explain in as much detail as possible.
This is the equation I am having a difficult time grasping:
W(of the force, from r_1, to r_2) = the Integral(from r_1, to r_2) of the vect.Force * d(vect r)
I've seen in other threads that the "d*r" in that equation can be listed in several different ways, but this is the way it is in my text.
Is there any way someone could explain how this line integral is giving the total work?
I understand the KE and PE equations, where I just insert the knowns and solve for the unknowns.
I don't understand how taking the anti-derivative of a Force and then multiplying it by the distance the Force "went" is going to give me how many joules of Energy.
I apologize for such a long post, and if the answer is somewhere else, and I have missed it, just direct me to the correct place and no answer will be needed.
Thank you for your time.
-B.G.:confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
See https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=8997" for instructions on how to generate formulas. Note, that due to a recent upgrade the perview function does not generate the equations. To see the result you must post your message. You can edit it for up to 24hrs after the inital post.

General questions are hard to answer, you may want to look through our tutorials for some helpful information.

Otherwise, post specific questions showing your work or at least your understanding of what you need to do.

Welcome to the Physicsforums.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Integral said:
See https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=8997" for instructions on how to generate formulas. Note, that due to a recent upgrade the perview function does not generate the equations. To see the result you must post your message. You can edit it for up to 24hrs after the inital post.
General questions are hard to answer, you may want to look through our tutorials for some helpful information.
Otherwise, post specific questions showing your work or at least your understanding of what you need to do.
Welcome to the Physicsforums.


Sounds great, thanks man.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top