Physics and Engineering Undergraduate workload.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on comparing the workload of Physics and Electrical Engineering (EEE) undergraduate courses in UK universities. Participants note that while Physics may involve challenging material requiring extensive revision, Engineering typically includes numerous labs, reports, and projects that can be time-consuming. The workload ultimately depends on individual skill sets and preferences, as both fields present their own challenges. Many agree that Physics students may also face significant lab work, making direct comparisons difficult. The decision on which course to pursue hinges on personal interests and desired career paths, especially considering employability in finance versus engineering.
OrangeMelon
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Can anyone give a comparison of the workload's in terms of hours your likely to have as a Physics undergrad compared to an Engineering (EEE specifically) one? (UK university's incase it's country dependent)

I'm trying to decide which course to take and although I'm more interested in Physics, I'm leaning towards Engineering due to the employability prospects. (I want to work in finance but Engineering would be a secondary career if finance doesn't work out)

I think the deciding factor will be made upon knowing which course has the highest workload. As I know a lot of people overlook extra curriculars and I'd like to have a little time to play some sports etc. I've heard some people say that Physics contains harder material (more hours spent revising notes), but Engineering has all the labs, lab reports, group and individual projects which take up a lot of time and so it total's to a lot more work. Other people have said that Physics students also get all the other 'stuff' and have to work just as long as the Engineers.

So what's the truth, specifically in terms of bare-minimum hours of work (not including re-reading notes or the 2 extra hours you're meant to spend per hour of lecture time), just pure work, who has the harsher workload?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's almost impossible to answer, really. Physics students sometimes have just as many labs, and engineering work can be just as (if not more) conceptually difficult.

It depends on what your skill set is (you can only measure work load in terms of how fast you can work). It is true that, in general, you'd have more design-oriented projects in engineering, and those can be time-consuming.
 
axmls said:
That's almost impossible to answer, really. Physics students sometimes have just as many labs, and engineering work can be just as (if not more) conceptually difficult.

It depends on what your skill set is (you can only measure work load in terms of how fast you can work). It is true that, in general, you'd have more design-oriented projects in engineering, and those can be time-consuming.

Thanks for the reply, I understand what you mean. Though I know there's a fair amount of maths in both and topics like mechanics/circuit theory which will be around in both engineering and physics, so I'd imagine a lot of the skills are transferable. I enjoy working more on my own and doing calculation based work over researching existing products and writing reports which I know a lot of engineering is. Judging by the module summaries, I can already say which ones I'm looking forward too (maths, circuit theory) and which I'm going to hate (Product design, Electronics in Industry).
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top