Physics book like spivak's calculus

AI Thread Summary
For studying electromagnetism, recommendations include Schwinger's text, though it's noted for its formal rigor and difficulty, making it potentially unsuitable for those lacking advanced math background. Fleming's "Functions in Several Variables" is suggested for multivariable calculus, being rigorous yet elementary, while Spivak's "Calculus on Manifolds" and Munkres' "Analysis on Manifolds" are also comparable in rigor to Spivak's original calculus book. For a more accessible introduction, Bachman's "A Geometric Approach to Differential Forms" is recommended, offering a less rigorous but helpful overview. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the importance of matching the complexity of the texts to the reader's mathematical preparedness.
Bashir Saddad
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I am studying electromagnetism and I can't skip a topic and go to the next unless I learn it. Can anyone please suggest a physics book and a calculus book on multivariables as rigorous as spivak's calculus?
thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Bashir Saddad said:
Hello,
I am studying electromagnetism and I can't skip a topic and go to the next unless I learn it. Can anyone please suggest a physics book and a calculus book on multivariables as rigorous as spivak's calculus?
thanks
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0738200565/?tag=pfamazon01-20
 
clope023 said:

This book is very difficult to read. Schwinger is famous for treating physics "overly formal". I attempted it a few years ago and quickly gave up, realizing I needed more math ( I resorted to Morse&Feshbach which led to another disaster...)
 
sunjin09 said:
This book is very difficult to read. Schwinger is famous for treating physics "overly formal". I attempted it a few years ago and quickly gave up, realizing I needed more math ( I resorted to Morse&Feshbach which led to another disaster...)

I see what you mean, I tend to like formal rigour so Schwinger's text seems right up my alley. I wouldn't have even looked at it unless I had my courses in complex variables, PDE's and Fourier analysis though and even skimming the book seems very daunting. For a junior senior undergrad without as much math probably wangsness is a better text.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0471811866/?tag=pfamazon01-20
 
For multivariable, I can recommend Fleming's "Functions in several variables". Quite rigorous and complete book, but also elementary. It goes right up to proving Stokes theorem.
 
Spivak's 'Calculus on Manifolds' is a multivariable calculus book similar in rigor to Spivak's 'Calculus', as is Munkre's 'Analysis on Manifolds'. You should be able to handle the first 3 chapters of Calc on Manifolds with little issue (no issue if you have some linear algebra under your belt). Chapters 4 and 5 are much more difficult IMO.

You can try going right into them, but if it turns out to be too much Bachman's 'A Geometric Approach to Differential Forms' is a more elementary (but less rigorous) guide to the subject matter of these chapters. You could read this to get a feel for the material, and then go back to Calculus on Manifolds. If I recall correctly, both books are around 130 pages. Bachman's book mostly has problems with calculations as opposed to proofs, which would also be useful.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top