Physics Book Problem: Berlin-Paris Train Error

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a train traveling from Berlin to Paris, covering a distance of 890 km and overshooting by 10 meters. Participants debate whether the total distance can be accurately expressed as 890,010 meters. The consensus is that while 890,000 meters is acceptable as it reflects the same distance, adding the 10 meters is insignificant due to the precision of the original measurement. The significance of significant figures is highlighted, suggesting that the original distance may only be accurate to three significant figures. Ultimately, the addition of the overshoot does not substantially alter the overall distance representation.
iampaul
Messages
93
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A train travels 890 km from Berlin to Paris and then overshoots the end of the track by 10m.

Homework Equations



a.What is the %error in the total distance covered
b.Is it correct to write the distance by the train as 890,010m?Explain.

The Attempt at a Solution


I got the answer for a. The book says that the answer for b is no. But I am not sure why. Can someone help me with b.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
iampaul said:

Homework Statement



A train travels 890 km from Berlin to Paris and then overshoots the end of the track by 10m.

Homework Equations



a.What is the %error in the total distance covered
b.Is it correct to write the distance by the train as 890,010m?Explain.

The Attempt at a Solution


I got the answer for a. The book says that the answer for b is no. But I am not sure why. Can someone help me with b.

have you ever read the headline in the news paper "65,000 attend football final" and thought that if only you had gone there would have been 65 001 people there! I don't think that would be true either, for the same sort of reason.
 
for B., Since 1Km=1000m, Writing 890,000m can be considered because it is the same as 890km. There's nothing wrong in using any of the two.
 
andorei said:
for B., Since 1Km=1000m, Writing 890,000m can be considered because it is the same as 890km. There's nothing wrong in using any of the two.

At best, 890 km is specified to three significant figures, so to add another 10m really is insignificant. Berlin might actually be 890.2 km away anyway.
There is a chance that the distance is supposed to be only 2 figure accuracy. Berlin might be 892 km away, but it is rounded to 890.

And the football crowd of 65,000 was probably rounded to the nearest 1000 people!
 
Not to mention that neither the train nor Berlin are mathematical points. So how would one go about measuring the "distance" between the train and Berlin? Where in Berlin do you put one point of your measuring tape and where on the train do you put the other end?
 
thanks a lot!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Back
Top