Physics + CE masters versus CE undergrad

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the transition from a physics background to a career in computer engineering, particularly in tech companies like RIM, Intel, and AMD. Participants emphasize that while a master's degree in computer engineering (CE) is advantageous, practical experience often outweighs academic qualifications. They note that undergraduates in CE may be favored for positions, especially if they are pursuing advanced degrees. Concerns are raised about the competitiveness of the job market and the necessity of having a solid foundation in CE principles, which may require taking additional undergraduate courses before applying for a master's program. The presence of research labs in major tech companies that employ physics PhDs is acknowledged, indicating opportunities for interdisciplinary research, particularly in materials science related to chips and hard drives. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of aligning educational qualifications with industry demands while navigating the challenges of transitioning fields.
cscott
Messages
778
Reaction score
1
How do these two compare to a tech (Apple, ARM, RIM, Asustek, etc) company? I ask this because I lost interest in doing computer engineering however working at RIM for coop has sparked my interest again. Where would I fit coming back to this company with a physics+CE masters? Would the engineer undergrads get snapped up long before me? It seems like a masters can't fully full the void between physics and computer engineering.

Do most of these companies have (large) research groups that would welcome materials-like research for, say, chips or HDDs?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cscott said:
How do these two compare to a tech (Apple, ARM, RIM, Asustek, etc) company? I ask this because I lost interest in doing computer engineering however working at RIM for coop has sparked my interest again. Where would I fit coming back to this company with a physics+CE masters? Would the engineer undergrads get snapped up long before me? It seems like a masters can't fully full the void between physics and computer engineering.

Do most of these companies have (large) research groups that would welcome materials-like research for, say, chips or HDDs?

Thanks.

A masters would be better than an undergrad, nonetheless. An undergrad CE would take the job over a masters CE if he has more experience. An employer should know that graduate level CE courses are more in-depth and have more value than undergrad CE courses. The first 2 years you spend at universities are general ed classes that have nothing to do with your major coursework.

I have always thought that your bachelor's degree becomes almost negligible when you have your masters.
 
I agree with fizziks, the only issue your going to run up against is if you have a Comp Eng undergrad who is going to get his Masters (which like 90% of Comp Eng) are probably doing because places like intel/amd/whoever won't let you touch hardware design unless you have a minimum of a masters. They will most likely pick the comp eng under with a masters in ce over a physics under with a masters in CE. But you can still find a job I'm sure.
 
Thanks. Your comments have been helpful.

I guess my biggest issue is only being in second year and I don't quite know exactly what I want to do, just a few general areas.

Do intel/amd/etc have research labs with physics PhD's? If so, what kind of research is done?

I guess my worst fear is definitely wanting to make the switch to engineering and having to make up first year courses.

One last question: If you feel you're under prepared for masters-level courses do places often let you take a term of undergrad courses or should this be done at the end of your undergrad degree, before even applying for a masters? Here I'm talking about someone changing their field 'slightly', i.e. physics undergrad then CE masters or engineering then physics PhD...

I do know an engineer going for his PhD in physics... he was the TA for one of my first year labs.
 
Last edited:
Yes they have labs with physics PhDs. Even IBM. R&D is needed, especially when you're working on the next generation technology. It will be highly competitive though.
 
cscott said:
Thanks. Your comments have been helpful.

I guess my biggest issue is only being in second year and I don't quite know exactly what I want to do, just a few general areas.

Do intel/amd/etc have research labs with physics PhD's? If so, what kind of research is done?

I guess my worst fear is definitely wanted to make the switch to engineering and having to make up first year courses.

One last question: If you feel you're under prepared for masters-level courses do places often let you take a term of undergrad courses or should this be done at the end of your undergrad degree, before even applying for a masters?

They do have physicists with PhDs in their labs for research and development. But they're not very easy to get nor is a PhD in physics. But the job outlook seems to be much better for a Masters in CE than a PhD physicist. In the long run, you have to look at the bills :frown:. I'm starting to realize that since I'm off to my own now. You got to work no matter what to self-sustain yourself.

I got into the CE masters program at a local state school here, even though I was a physics major with little CE background. ATM, I'm taking enrolled as a non-degree student taking the important pre-reqs for a CE (mainly computer architecture, software engineering, and microprocessors). Some schools will let you in with the exception that you taken certain pre-reqs.
 
I think if I went to UWaterloo for my Masters (I'm doing my undergrad physics here, at UW) they'd let me in with little missing prereqs so long as I stress my physics degree in EM theory, electronics and communications where I can.

I still love the physics courses :)
 
Back
Top