Physics Electrostatics Question

AI Thread Summary
Charged particles in a conductor move to the surface to ensure that the electric field inside the conductor is zero, preventing any internal current that would violate conservation of energy. This behavior aligns with Coulomb's Law, where the force of attraction between particles in a conductor is negligible due to infinite permittivity. The discussion also touches on the complexities of permittivity in various materials, suggesting that understanding these nuances can be challenging. Gauss's Law is mentioned as a key principle that further explains this phenomenon, although it hasn't been covered in class yet. Overall, the movement of charges to the surface is a fundamental characteristic of conductors in electrostatics.
Sneha_rk
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Why do charged particles come to the surface of a conductor if there is no repulsions between them (the charged particles), as suggested by Columb's Law?

Homework Equations



Columb's Law
F=kq1q2
r2

The Attempt at a Solution



The permittivity of a conductor is infinity. So according to columb's law, the force of attraction between any two particles in a conductor is zero, because any number divided by infinity is zero. But charged particles are found only on the surface of the conductor. How did they get there? How do they stay there?

Would chemical bonding have anything to do with the answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not a trivial question to answer. The permittivity constants that we're used to dealing with are a simplified form. For complex materials with varying degrees of conductivity and dependencies on frequency of field oscillations the permittivity is a complex value (real and imaginary parts). It is often easier to simply assume the known behavior of charges and fields for conductors and insulators than to delve into the details of what is going on with the characteristics of space inside them!

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=328298" to a similar thread that took place a while back. It may give you some insight (or perhaps added confusion!).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
hello Sneha...Welcome to Physics Forums!

in a conductor, the charges come to the surface, so that electric field inside it is zero. if it was non-zero, then there would be a current inside the conductor, which would violate conservation of energy.
 
That makes sense. Thanks!
I also that heard it is explained in Gauss Law, but we haven't completed that in class.
 
welcome. yes Gauss Law is used to explain it. study it and you will understand. you are in class 11 i suppose.
 
I think I'll just wait for it to be explained in class.
Actually, no. 9th. :-/
Aah, corporate schools. They make so much sense, don't they?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top