Physics Engineering: Job Diff vs Engineer

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the differences between roles in research and development (R&D) for physics graduates versus traditional engineering positions. It highlights that while a physicist may not be certified like an engineer, many companies employ physicists in engineering roles, often under the title of engineer. The conversation emphasizes the variability in educational curricula across institutions, particularly in engineering physics programs, which can affect job prospects and responsibilities. Participants note that their degrees often overlap significantly with engineering disciplines, with some coursework tailored more towards physics. The presence of engineers with PhDs in physics in high-profile technology companies is mentioned, indicating that advanced physics knowledge is valued in engineering contexts. Ultimately, the discussion underscores the importance of specific educational backgrounds and the titles used in the industry, which can influence career paths in R&D.
cscott
Messages
778
Reaction score
1
"Physics Engineering"

If I get my BSc and some associated higher degree and go into the industry where I'm put into some R&D program, how will my job differ from that of an engineer? I understand that a physicist isn't ceritified like an engineer, but by how much would that limit me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have a degree in Engineering Physics, and these programs vary wildly from school to school. It will be tough to answer your question without some background info. Can you post a link to your school's Physics Engineering curriculum?
 
Well, I am am double major in electrical engineering and engineeing physics. The engineering physics degree here is basically the same exact thing as the professional physics degree, except the engineering physics degree lacks the analytical mechanics requirement, and instead you take statics and dynamics. Also, in engineering physics, all of the free electives in the physics program are pretty much filled with engineering classes.
 
I work in the technology development section of a High Profile company. Several of the engineers I work with have PhDs in Physics. There may be companies who have positions entitled Physicist but I will bet you will find most positions are called engineers. Few if any of the engineers in the company I work for are Certified PEs.
 
That (edit: "that" being leright's response) illustrates what I mean by wild variance from school to school. My degree program was basically the same as the Nuclear Engineering program. But while NE majors took a 2-semester sequence of reactor engineering and 1 semester of electronics for non-EE majors, we took a 2-semester sequence of quantum mechanics and 1 semester of circuit analysis for EE majors. We also had to take an upper level course in electrodynamics (Griffiths). We were encouraged to use our electives on more math and physics.

So it's really not possible to answer the question in the OP without seeing the curriculum.
 
Sorry, I meant to add that I'm taking just honours physics. I guess I wasn't clear.
 
Integral said:
I work in the technology development section of a High Profile company. Several of the engineers I work with have PhDs in Physics. There may be companies who have positions entitled Physicist but I will bet you will find most positions are called engineers. Few if any of the engineers in the company I work for are Certified PEs.

This is what I was getting at. Thanks!
 
Back
Top