Physics: Expansion at constant pressure

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the number of moles, final temperature, and work done by an ideal monoatomic gas expanding at constant pressure. The user is struggling with the calculation using the ideal gas law (PV=nRT) and is converting units incorrectly, specifically converting volume from cubic meters to liters. The method of using the equation of state for the initial state is deemed appropriate, but the conversion of units is highlighted as a potential error. There is a suggestion to keep the volume in cubic meters rather than converting it. Accurate calculations are essential for determining the correct values for moles and other properties of the gas.
FutureE'neer
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
An unknown number of moles of an ideal monoatomic gas expand reversibly from Vi = 2.30 m3 to Vf = 3.10 m3, at a constant pressure of 1.71 atm and an initial temperature of 300 K.
Find the number of moles of gas.
Find the final temperature of the gas K.
Calculate the work done by the gas.

I cannot find the number of moles and I don't know what I'm doing wrong.
I'm using PV=nRT
Converting the pressure in atm to N/m^2 and m^3 to L. I'm using the initial volume for V, 8.315 for R and the initial temp in K and solving for n. I keep getting the same answer and it is coming up wrong. Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Keywords are "ideal monoatomic gas expand reversibly "
What does that mean to you?
 
that's how much it fluctuate's?
 
FutureE'neer said:
I cannot find the number of moles and I don't know what I'm doing wrong.
I'm using PV=nRT
Converting the pressure in atm to N/m^2 and m^3 to L. I'm using the initial volume for V, 8.315 for R and the initial temp in K and solving for n. I keep getting the same answer and it is coming up wrong. Please help!
Can you show what you did (and how do you know is wrong)?
The method (using equation of state for initial state) seems OK.
 
Don't change m^3 to litres
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top