Schools Pursuing Graduate School in Physics After English & Music Major

AI Thread Summary
Transitioning from a liberal arts background in English and Music to a career in theoretical physics is challenging but not impossible. Graduate programs in physics typically require a strong foundation in math and physics, usually accumulated over four years of undergraduate study, amounting to 80-100 credits. While self-study and dedication can potentially allow for entry into a graduate program after taking some physics courses, the complexity of the subject matter makes it difficult to grasp advanced concepts without a solid educational background. Notable examples, such as string theorist Ed Witten, demonstrate that unconventional paths can lead to success in physics, but a genuine enjoyment of math is crucial, as it underpins all physics work. Alternative career options, like science writing, are also available for those with a passion for both the arts and sciences.
optforfirst
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am currently at a high ranking liberal arts undergraduate school finishing a major in English and Music, but have always had a pine for theoretical physics. I've always loved string theory, big bang, reading Hawking, Einstein, Newton, math (when I get it) and would like to go into that field if possible as a career. Is it possible to go to a grad school after taking some courses for theoretical physics? (obviously not a great one)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
optforfirst said:
I am currently at a high ranking liberal arts undergraduate school finishing a major in English and Music, but have always had a pine for theoretical physics. I've always loved string theory, big bang, reading Hawking, Einstein, Newton, math (when I get it) and would like to go into that field if possible as a career. Is it possible to go to a grad school after taking some courses for theoretical physics? (obviously not a great one)

You need to read this post by ZapperZ:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=64966

It will answer your questions.
 
it really depends on you, if you work really hard, then you might be able to get into grad school, in one or two years. The thing about it is that physics is a very involved field, and an undergraduate education in physics usually includes about 80-100 credits worth of math and physics classes which usually takes 4 years to get through. and more than that all of that stuff builds off of the previous stuff so that it is very difficult to get through it in a brief period of time, or even understand the stuff that comes later ie. in grad school.

So you might be able to go to a physics grad school, if you worked really hard and were willing to teach yourself this stuff day in and day out (although I can't say that's a good way to learn it). Alternatively you could stop working on your english major and start working on a physics one.

Its not impossible to do, a very prominent string theorist Ed Witten got his bachelors in history.

EDIT: it just occurred to me t ask this, but do you enjoy math? because as a physics major you'd be doing lots of math, and more than that all of physics is written in math, an all the really meaningfull work involves a lot of math.

its always possible to become a science columnist or something along those lines
 
Last edited:
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
I have a specialization in condensed matter physics and materials physics, and off-late, I have been seeing a lot of research directions moving towards quantum computing (AMO and non-linear optics) and the huge chunk of quantum materials research (and funding) is dedicated towards QIS and QC research. I am wondering (sort of in a dilemma), if I should consider switching my field? I am currently at the stage of a postdoc.
Back
Top