Physics or Joint Math/Physics Honours?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on choosing between a joint degree in Math and Physics versus a straightforward Physics degree. The joint degree is perceived as better preparation for graduate studies, particularly in theoretical physics, despite having fewer upper-level physics courses. Participants note that the first year is common to both programs, with a decision required in the second year. Concerns about the limited upper-level physics courses are addressed by highlighting the option to take additional physics electives if time permits. The conversation also touches on the academic rigor of the joint program, which is noted to be challenging, with only a few graduates each year. The participants express a shared background from Quebec and plan to enroll in the program together.
palex3
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Which of the two would you recommend? I'm thinking that a joint degree in Math and Physics would be better for graduate studies, but the courses for a simple physics degree sound "more fun":
http://www.physics.mcgill.ca/ugrads/math.html
http://www.physics.mcgill.ca/ugrads/honours.html
Specifically, the last year curriculum varies. The complementary courses for Physics offer more variety, whereas it seems to me that the physics/math courses are pretty restricted (when it comes to physics). So, which one is best in your opinion?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first year(U1) is common to both programs, so you have to choose only at the 2nd year. Basically, you replace the labs and the research project with math courses and you have less upper level physics to take. It's a good preparation for theoretical physics. It's also the hardest of the physics program, about only 5 graduate each year. Next fall I am enrolling in that program after I finish my CEGEP.
 
Last edited:
I see. The main thing that was worrying me was the lack of uper-level physics courses, but I guess I can always take whatever I'm missing as a grad student. I guess I'll see you there next fall, then!
 
You can take other physics courses as electives if you have extra time, you are not limited to only the classes they require.
 
palex3 said:
I see. The main thing that was worrying me was the lack of uper-level physics courses, but I guess I can always take whatever I'm missing as a grad student. I guess I'll see you there next fall, then!

Just to know, are you from Quebec or from somewhere else ? I'm from Quebec and I speak french as my mother tongue.
 
gab_6666 said:
Just to know, are you from Quebec or from somewhere else ? I'm from Quebec and I speak french as my mother tongue.
I'm in the same situation as you are.

mgiddy911 said:
You can take other physics courses as electives if you have extra time, you are not limited to only the classes they require.

I hadn't thought of that, but it makes sense. The required classes add up to 81 credits, and 3 years is 90 credits, so that means I have 9 other credits to take (I think), or 3 other classes (3 credits/class).

Thanks for your help!
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top