Physics or Mathematical Physics: Which Major Should I Choose?

  • Thread starter Thread starter redbeard
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Choices
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on choosing between a physics major and a mathematical physics major at Waterloo University. The individual is drawn to the theoretical aspects of mathematical physics but is concerned about the rigorous math requirements and their own math capabilities, having achieved an 85% in Grade 12 advanced functions. They recognize that a physics major may offer more hands-on experience through labs, which is valuable for a career, but fear missing out on theoretical interests. Key points raised include the pros and cons of each major, with a recommendation to pursue a physics major while taking additional math courses or even considering a double major. This approach allows for flexibility in career options and the possibility of exploring different fields within physics, including experimental areas that may be more appealing than theoretical concepts. The discussion emphasizes the importance of not limiting oneself early in their academic journey and encourages a broad exposure to both physics and mathematics.
redbeard
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
So I want to go into physics at waterloo university, but I'm stuck with deciding whether I should take physics, or mathematical physics.

Mathematical physics seems to be the major in which I'll learn all that beautiful theoretical stuff that I've read about in books (ex: the elegant unvierse). But then again, from my understanding, mathematical physics is also very rigourous in terms of math. I do enjoy math, but I don't know how far my capabilities would take me (85% in gr12 advanced functions)

And now for the physics major, it'd probably be not so strictly formalist in terms of math and such, and it'd also offer more hands-on experience (labs) which is probably important for a career, but then, I think "what if i miss out on some of the stuff that could interest me by taking this instead of mathematical physics?".

So there's pros and cons to each, but I don't know which one to decide on. my questions for you guys are:

-what's the pros and cons to each?
-from what I said, what do you think would be a better course of action for me?
-am i able to switch easily between the majors in case i make the wrong decision?, like they are only partially in the same faculty, and wouldn't i need to take extra courses to be able to pull myself into the other?


thanks for your opinions and advice.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My advice is to major in physics and take as many extra math courses along the way as you can, maybe even double major. I think everyone, whether they want to do experiment or theory, should take as many labs and as many math courses as possible.

By doing this you'll still leave your options open to do theory in grad school, but you also won't limit yourself to only doing theory. If your experience is anything like mine, you may realize that you find a different field of physics, maybe even an experimental field, more interesting than anything in Brian Greene's books.

My advice in short:

I don't think you should limit yourself early on when you really haven't been formally exposed to much physics at all. I say do the physics major with extra math courses or a double major in math.

Whatever the decision, good luck to you!
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top