Physics paper on the conservation of energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the conservation of energy as illustrated through pole vaulting. A pole vaulter converts kinetic energy from their sprint into gravitational potential energy at the peak of the jump, where kinetic energy reaches zero. As the vaulter descends, potential energy is converted back into kinetic energy until they land. Upon impact with the ground, all energy transforms into heat, sound, and other forms, resulting in no remaining gravitational potential or kinetic energy. Overall, the explanation of energy transformation in pole vaulting is accurate, though real-world factors like air resistance can cause energy loss.
Alethia
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
I'm writing a physics paper on the conservation of energy. I used the topic pole vaulting to depict the conservation of energy. This is what I have in my report.
A pole vaulter will begin his or her vault with a sprint to build up kinetic energy, also known as motion energy. The kinetic energy will then be used once the pole vaulter is airborne, then converted to gravitational potential energy. The greatest kinetic energy will result in the maximum vertical distance. Once the pole vaulter reaches the highest point in air, his or her kinetic energy will be zero, but his or her potential energy will reach its maximum. As the pole vaulter falls back to the ground, his or her potential energy is then converted into kinetic energy until the jumper comes to rest. When the pole vaulter is at rest, he or she posses potential energy that has been converted from the kinetic energy.
I'm not 100% sure if what I have is correct, but I believe it to be. Would you please read over the information and make sure that it is valid?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're all fine and dandy until you get to this point:

As the pole vaulter falls back to the ground, his or her potential energy is then converted into kinetic energy until the jumper comes to rest. When the pole vaulter is at rest, he or she posses potential energy that has been converted from the kinetic energy.

As the pole vaulter falls, he/she definitely does trade GPE for KE, and continues to do so allll the way down until he/she smacks into the ground.

At that point, all the energy of his/her motion is converted into heat and sound and flying sand.

Once he/she is back on the ground, he/she possesses no more GPE. If he/she is also no longer moving, she possesses no more KE either. She gave up all her energy when she collided with the ground.

- Warren
 


Your understanding of the conservation of energy in the context of pole vaulting is correct. The key concept here is that energy cannot be created or destroyed, but it can be converted from one form to another. In the case of pole vaulting, the vaulter's initial sprint converts into kinetic energy, which is then converted into potential energy as they reach the highest point of their jump. As they come back down to the ground, the potential energy is once again converted into kinetic energy until they come to rest.

One thing to note is that in reality, some energy is lost due to factors such as air resistance and friction. This is why the vaulter does not reach the same height on their descent as they did on their ascent. However, the overall principle of conservation of energy still applies.

Overall, your understanding and explanation of the conservation of energy in the context of pole vaulting is accurate. Good job on your physics paper!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top