PHYSICS: Poschel-Teller Potential and Natural Frequency Derivation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the natural frequency of small oscillations for a particle in the Poschel-Teller potential. The potential is given as V(x) = -V_{0}sech^{2}(x/\lambda), which is not harmonic but can be analyzed using a Taylor series expansion around its minimum. The key insight is that the leading term in the expansion will be quadratic in x, allowing it to be related to a harmonic potential. The effective spring constant k can be derived from the second derivative of the potential at the minimum. A participant confirms their understanding but questions the necessity of including higher-order terms in the expansion.
Void123
Messages
138
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle of mass m moves in the one dimensional Poschel-Teller potential V(x). Find an expression for the natural frequency of small oscillations.

Homework Equations



V(x) = -V_{0}sech^{2}(x/\lambda)

The Attempt at a Solution



I am making the uncertain assumption that this would be the angular frequency. But, I do not know how to derive it based on just the potential alone. I have tried to determine the period as well, graphically, but this function doesn't seem to be the type associated with normal periodic motion.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The potential that you have is not a harmonic potential, however any potential that is an even function can be expanded in Taylor series about its minimum and will have a leading term that is quadratic in x. The words "small oscillations" is a hint that you need to make this expansion. First plot your potential to make sure that it has a minimum, then expand about x = 0. Ignore the constant, that's the "zero of energy". The leading term will be

\frac{1}{2}\;\frac{d^{2}V}{dx^{2}}\big|_{x=0}\;x^{2}

That's a term that can be related to a harmonic potential of the form

\frac{1}{2}\;kx^{2}

whose frequency you can easily extract from the effective spring constant k.
 
kuruman said:
The potential that you have is not a harmonic potential, however any potential that is an even function can be expanded in Taylor series about its minimum and will have a leading term that is quadratic in x. The words "small oscillations" is a hint that you need to make this expansion. First plot your potential to make sure that it has a minimum, then expand about x = 0. Ignore the constant, that's the "zero of energy". The leading term will be

\frac{1}{2}\;\frac{d^{2}V}{dx^{2}}\big|_{x=0}\;x^{2}

That's a term that can be related to a harmonic potential of the form

\frac{1}{2}\;kx^{2}

whose frequency you can easily extract from the effective spring constant k.

I figured it out. Thanks!

But just one tiny question, if the leading term is going to be a quadratic, then the original expansion has to be out to the fourth power?
 
Last edited:
I must not be doing something right, the whole thing went to zero.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
606
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top