Physics Problem Conservation of Energy

AI Thread Summary
A skier weighing 60.0 kg descends a 60.0 m slope, reaching a speed of 28.8 m/s after friction does -10.5 kJ of work. Upon crossing a soft snow patch with a coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.2 and air resistance of 160 N, her speed reduces to 6.35 m/s. The skier then penetrates a snowdrift 2.9 m before stopping, leading to confusion over the calculation of the average force exerted on her. An initial calculation yields 417 N, but this is incorrect; using g = 9.807 m/s² gives a correct average force of 414 N. The discussion emphasizes that average force should be calculated over time rather than distance, highlighting a common misunderstanding in applying the work-energy theorem.
John_Smithson
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 60.0 kg skier starts from rest at the top of a ski slope 60.0 m high.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


(a) If frictional forces do -10.5 kJ of work on her as she descends, how fast is she going at the bottom of the slope?
This one I got correct, it's 28.8 m/s.

(b)Now moving horizontally, the skier crosses a patch of soft snow, where µk = 0.2. If the patch is 85.0 m wide and the average force of air resistance on the skier is 160 N, how fast is she going after crossing the patch?
This one I also have correct, 6.35 m/s

(c) The skier hits a snowdrift and penetrates 2.9 m into it before coming to a stop. What is the average force exerted on her by the snowdrift as it stops her?

I derived the equation F = m*(Velocity from answer B)^2/(2*2.9m). This gets me 417N. However, it is not the right answer. I also know that the sign is not the problem, as neither 417N or -417N give the right answer. I used the work energy theorem to get F*d = 1/2m(VB)^2, and then just divided the kinetic energy by the distance to get the average Force. I don't know what I am doing worng.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I get 417 N, too.

If the deceleration is not uniform and the force gets averaged over time, the value can be different (and you cannot calculate it with additional information), but that cannot be the issue here.[/size]
 
If I do the calculations using g = 9.807 m/s the result is 414 N. I wonder how sensitive the marking bot is to sig figs here?
 
Even though the highest sig figs in the problem is 3, it does expect you to use g = 9.807 instead, and 414N was correct. Thanks.
 
Part c is a wrong question. This comes up regularly. You cannot compute the "average force" from the energy and the distance. Yes, you can compute an average over distance, but consider this: average acceleration is defined as an average over time, Δv/Δt. So the reasonable definition of average force is also over time; for constant mass it's mΔv/Δt. That is not in general the same as an average ov distance.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top