Physics problem, why is my answer wrong? HELPPP

  • Thread starter Thread starter CinderBlockFist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two neutron stars and their motion as they approach each other. The original poster calculates the final velocity when the stars are half their initial separation but arrives at an incorrect answer. Key points include the need to account for both neutron stars in the kinetic energy calculation and to correctly interpret the distance in the equations. The conversation highlights the importance of using conservation of energy principles and adjusting calculations based on the problem's specifics. Ultimately, the poster realizes the mistake of not doubling the kinetic energy due to both stars contributing to the motion.
CinderBlockFist
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Two neutron stars are separated by a distance of 10^13 m. They each have a mass of 10^30 kg and a radius of 10^5 m. They are initially at rest with respect to each other.


(a) How fast are they moving when their separation has decreased to one-half its initial value?


My answer is 3.652 x 10^3 m/s , and it is wrong again (sigh).

here is my computations

1/2(mass)(final velocity)^2 - G(M1)(m2)/Final distance = 1/2(mass)(initial velocity)^2 - G(M1)(m2)/(initial radius)




Since they are initially at rest, the vi term is zero, and that kinetic energy term vanishes. Then i plug in the values and solve for final velocity:

1/2(10^30)(final velocity)^2 - (6.67x10^-11)(10^30)^2/(5x10^12) = -(6.67x10^-11)(10^30)^2/(10^13)



so I isolate for final velocity and i get (final velocity)^2 = 1.33 x 10^7

and i get final velocity = 3.652 x 10^3, when i input it it says it is wrong. Can someone help me, where did i go wrong? I did it multiple times already.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you have a 2 different ways to approach this problem
1. use reduced mass and the centrifugal force=gravitational force
2. use conservation of energy

both with end up with the same answer :wink:
 
I used conservation of energy, so where did i go wrong?
 
I used

Potential Energy Final + Kinetic Energy final = Potential energy initial + kinetic energy initial
 
the neutron starS are orbiting around each other... and the both have velocity and contain KE
 
In this problem, are you are they are orbiting around each other? Cauase in part B they collide, so I assumed they are in a straight line path toward each other. WTF
 
part b? you didn't mention that...
even if they are moving in a straight line, both neutron stars are moving (with same speed).
 
CinderBlockFist said:
Two neutron stars are separated by a distance of 10^13 m. They each have a mass of 10^30 kg and a radius of 10^5 m. They are initially at rest with respect to each other.


1/2(mass)(final velocity)^2 - G(M1)(m2)/Final distance = 1/2(mass)(initial velocity)^2 - G(M1)(m2)/(initial radius)




1/2(10^30)(final velocity)^2 - (6.67x10^-11)(10^30)^2/(5x10^12) = -(6.67x10^-11)(10^30)^2/(10^13)

Part A: Your equation is set up right, however you need to multiply the final kinetic energy by 2 since you have 2 neutron stars. final distance = 1/2 initial distance, subsitute that into the equation. Also you shouldn't really label r as the initial radius, because this part of the problem uses the distance (10^13m).

Part B: uses the same equation, but the distance is now 2x the radius which would be the diameter.

Should really work with variables first to simplify the equation, then start plugging in values.


Also what school do you go to? I was working on this same problem a couple of hours ago.
 
Last edited:
my part B) says: how fast are they moving just before they collide?

_____ m/s
 
  • #10
teknodude said:
Part A: Your equation is set up right, however you need to multiply the final kinetic energy by 2 since you have 2 neutron stars. final distance = 1/2 initial distance, subsitute that into the equation. Also you shouldn't really label r as the initial radius, because this part of the problem uses the distance (10^13m).

Part B: uses the same equation, but the distance is now 2x the radius which would be the diameter.

Should really work with variables first to simplify the equation, then start plugging in values.


Also what school do you go to? I was working on this same problem a couple of hours ago.

ahhh, i see, i didn't realize i had to multiply the final kinetic energy by 2...i missed that key point. Ok leme try to do my computations , brb TY.
 
  • #11
check ur pm box tekno
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
108
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Back
Top