Physics: Projectile Motion with different starting and ending heights?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a projectile motion problem involving a baseball thrown from a height of 1.5 meters at a 30-degree angle with an initial velocity of 20 m/s, aimed at a pole 20 meters away and 1.7 meters tall. Key calculations include determining the time to reach the pole using horizontal velocity, analyzing the height of the ball at that distance, and finding the final velocity and angle upon reaching the pole. Participants emphasize using trigonometric functions and kinematic equations to break down the motion into horizontal and vertical components, accounting for the difference in starting and ending heights. The importance of checking if the ball reaches the pole before hitting the ground is also highlighted, as it affects the accuracy of the time and height calculations. Overall, the thread provides insights into applying physics principles to solve projectile motion problems with varying heights.
015734
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
All the physics problems I have worked with thus far assume stating and ending at the same height. Any help is how to solve this is appreciated :-)

A baseball player throws a ball from height 1.5 meters at an angle of 30 degrees and an initial velocity of 20 m/s. He is trying to hit a pole 20 meters away which is 1.7 m tall. Forget about air drag, etc*how long does it take the ball to travel 20 meters (in the horizontal)
*what is the height of the ball when it reaches the pole?
*what is the final velocity of the ball?
*what is the final angle (assuming the ground is perfectly flat of course)

To find the time does this sound right?: t = (20meters)/(20m/s * cos (30))

This is where I am stuck... I would think height at 20 m is just the y component analyzed at 20 but I'm not sure about that. The final velocity I have not idea on and the final angle would probably be the sum of the x and y components although I don't know how to manipulate the formuli to get that :-( Any help is greatly appreciated :-)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
From any source can you find the equation of projectile motion which gives you the relation between x, y and angle of projection theta?
 
sure, do you mean y = (tan angle)x - ((gx^2)/(2(v(initial)cos(angle)^2) ?

x would be the distance to my object (in this case 20m)
I know the angle
I know acceleration due to gravity
The velocity I presume is the initial velocity before you break it into its components?
 
ok, find time taken to travel the 20m horizontaly using trig to find horizontal velocity
speed = distance/time ==> time = distance/speed
i would take 1.5m as being height=0 so the pole top is 0.2m then just add your 1.5 back in at the end, so esentualy your working out the change in height :]
now use trig again to find verticle velocity, you now know time to reach the pole.
use x=ut+(1/2)a(t^2) remember to keep track of your + and - signs
x=dissplacement, u=initial velocity(in this case vertical), a=acceleration, t=time

final velocity, horizontal doesn't change due to no horizontal forces hence obeys Newtons 1st law.
verticaly however use V^2=u^2+2ax
v=final velocity.
use c^2=a^2+b^2 (pythagoras) to combine ur horizontal and verticle components of the velocity.
also use trig with these velocity componetns to find the angle.
this is all true if the ball does reach the stick if the ball hits the floor befor it reaches the stick then your value for t will be incorect, if after working out your t like i stated you also use
v^2+u^2+2ax in the verticle to find the final verticle velocity (remember x is dissplacement not distance so here x would equal 1.5m) then use
v=u+at to find time. if this time is less than the time you calculated horizontaly then the ball won't reach the pole and use v=x/t ==> x=vt horizontal to see how far the ball travelsHope i helped.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top