Physics + pure math or applied math?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the ideal combination of majors for students interested in theoretical physics. Participants express a preference for pairing theoretical physics with applied mathematics, especially at the undergraduate level, due to the practical overlap between the two fields. Applied mathematics is seen as providing the necessary mathematical foundation for physics. In contrast, pure mathematics is suggested for graduate students pursuing advanced studies, as it encompasses more abstract concepts that can be relevant in higher-level theoretical physics, such as topology and Lie algebra. Overall, the consensus leans towards applied math for undergraduates and pure math for those advancing to postgraduate work.
bambi13
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
physics + pure math or applied math?

Hi.
What is the most ideal combination of majors?

1) theoretical physics + pure math
OR
2) theo. physics + applied math??

thanks a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Physics and applied math match up very well, as in they're both similar.
The mathematics needed for an ideal physics major comes mainly from applied mathematics.
 
TimNguyen said:
Physics and applied math match up very well, as in they're both similar.
The mathematics needed for an ideal physics major comes mainly from applied mathematics.

i'd agree with this.



piggyback -- when does one learn some of the pure math (topology, lie algebra?, etc.) involved with certain aspects of theoretical physics?
 
bambi13 said:
Hi.
What is the most ideal combination of majors?

1) theoretical physics + pure math
OR
2) theo. physics + applied math??

thanks a lot.
I'd say applied math if you are an undergrad going for a physics degree.

I'd say pure math if you are a graduate moving on to post graduate work.

Just my thoughts.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Back
Top