Physics QM vs EE QM for MSEE: Which is Better?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jbusc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ee Physics Qm
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the decision-making process for selecting a quantum mechanics course as part of a Master of Science in Electrical Engineering (MSEE) program. The individual is considering two courses: EE471, which is an applied quantum mechanics course for engineers, and PHYS438a, a more traditional physics course. The key points of concern are whether the EE471 course, which counts towards their degree, is sufficient for future applications to PhD programs in physics, or if the more rigorous PHYS438a course would be more beneficial. There is a consensus that while the EE course is adequate for the MSEE degree, taking the physics course could provide a deeper understanding and may be advantageous for transitioning into a physics PhD program. Ultimately, the choice may depend on future academic goals and interests in the field.
jbusc
Messages
210
Reaction score
0
I had posted before about my background, I am pursuing a BS in computer science and computer engineering, and will soon probably enter the MS electrical engineering program at my university - after that I am unsure whether to pursue a PhD in physics, electrical engineering, or another field.

So I am trying to determine my course structure for MSEE with this in mind, I can take quantum mechanics in the EE department, or in the physics department. Difference being, the EE course counts as subject credit(applied to degree) for me while the physics is nothing but elective units.

However if I am applying to Phd physics programs they may want to see the physics QM course? Is it important to do the physics course or is the EE course adequate? Thanks so much...

I have pasted course descriptions below for the courses in question, EE471 and PHYS438a. Unfortunately I have little more info.

EE 471 Applied Quantum Mechanics for Engineers (3) Introductory quantum mechanics and applications. Schrodinger equation, atomic and molecular processes, time-dependent perturbation theory. Applications to lasers, solid state demos and gaseous devices. Prerequisite: EE 330 or graduate standing.

PHYS 438ab Introduction to Quantum Mechanics and its Applications (a: 4, Sp; b: 4, Fa) a: Concepts and techniques of quantum mechanics; free and bound states, the hydrogen atom. b: Relativity, atomic spectra, quantum statistics, nuclear models, nuclear reactions, elementary particles. Prerequisite: PHYS 304; corequisite: MATH 445.

EE471 textbooks:· Molecular Quantum Mechanics, P. W. Atkins, R. S. Friedman. Third Edition, Oxford University Press, 1997 (MQM)
· An Introduction to Quantum Physics, A.R. French, E.F. Taylor. W.W. Norton & Company, 1978. (F&T)
· Electrons in Solids, R.H. Bube. Academic Press, 1992. (RB)
· The Feynman Lectures in Physics, Vol. III, R. P. Feynman, Addison Wesley, 1995. (FVIII)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
From my experience, if you change fields, you'll have to retake the courses. Take the EE QM class for your degree and if you change fields, then retake the Physics course, it won't hurt to see the material from another vantage point.
 
On the other hand, taking the Physics course might help you with your decision on whether or not you want to switch.
 
Gokul43201 said:
On the other hand, taking the Physics course might help you with your decision on whether or not you want to switch.

I agree...
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top