Physics: Springs and Blocks - Mu(k), Compression, Ramp Height, Speed

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the distance a block travels after descending a frictionless ramp with a height of 29m and an initial speed of 11.8 m/s. The block experiences no friction on the ramp but does encounter friction on the flat surface, complicating the calculations. Participants suggest using kinematics and energy principles to address the problem, particularly focusing on the effects of friction and the block's jump at the ramp's end. There is uncertainty about whether to factor in the jump and its impact on the block's motion. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the complexities of applying work and energy principles in this scenario.
Cyto
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
http://www.myimgs.com/data/Cyto/Physics.jpg

The ramp and the ledge which the box sits on is has a Mu(k) of 0... the spring compression of the block when released from rest is 98cm... i found the height of the ramp being 29m, and the speed at the top of the ramp being 11.8.. i just need help finding the length of the last part before the block stops moving... the above diagram gives the rest of the info needed
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know about work and energy calculations?

Otherwise, you can use kinematics to do this problem since the acceleration caused by friction is constant.

P.S. This is a poor problem because the block will jump at the end of the ramp, and then bounce on the 'flat', and it's unclear whether or how you're supposed to account for it unless the block is affected by some sort of frictionless constraint.
 
Ya, i understand energy and work calculations, but just don't get this problem and there is supposed to be no friction on the ramp, only on the top
 
Ok. Consider this:
The block has an x component velocity of vx at the top of the ramp. The acceleration due to friction will be -μmg from there on, so you can use the constant acceleration formulae in one dimension.

A major problem for me is that it's unclear whether you're supposed to account for the jump that the block makes before it starts sliding on the surface. (If you're feeling truly insane, you could deal with the bouncing and spinnning that would occur in that scenario as well.)
 
I do think I am insane, yes, but would not like to use your crazy methods. Is there a way to use kinetic/potential energy and W=Fad to find the distance.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top