Physics with rigorous math - need advice

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between physics and mathematics, particularly in the context of studying general relativity. The original poster expresses a preference for rigorous mathematical approaches over physical intuition but desires to work in physics rather than mathematics. The response emphasizes that physics encompasses both theoretical and experimental components, suggesting that the field of mathematical physics might align with the poster's interests. It also highlights the importance of clarifying the level of math courses currently being taken, as the definition of "rigorous" can vary between physics and mathematics. The conversation encourages providing more details about the poster's academic background for more tailored advice.
leo.
Messages
90
Reaction score
4
Hi all, I have a doubt regarding the connection between physics and math. I'm studying physics at college but I'm a little confused. My main area of interest is general relativity, so what I really want to do is to work on that area, however I prefer (and I have more hability) to atack problems with rigorous math rather with physical intuition.

The point here is: I have more hability when rigorous math is involved, however I don't want to become mathematician, I want to work with physics in general relativity. I know that physics needs experiment, and that is why I feel confused.

Can someone give me an advice about that ? Is there a way to combine the study of physics with rigorous math or it's only possible to work with physics through experiments ?

Thanks a lot in advance and sorry if I've said something very silly, if I did is because I really don't understand this completely.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well I'm sure that other members will be much more equipped to answer your question, but it sounds to me like you just described the field of mathematical physics.
 
Possibly what PiAreSquared said. Physics doesn't only require experiment. There's both theory and experiment and they aren't mutually exclusive either. I think "rigorous" in this case may be ill-defined. What courses are you taking right now? Rigorous math in a physicist's eyes may be completely different than that of a mathematician's. If you are only taking an introductory sequence right now, the math will become more interesting in your later courses, but it won't be on the level of say, real analysis.
 
Where on the path are you? High school? Grad school? What math have you taken?

If you want meaningful responses to this sort of question you need to provide some details.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top