Calculate Work Done by Gravity: Physics Homework Problem

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the work done by gravity on a 0.179 kg ball thrown upward from 1.94 m, the force of gravity is determined using F = mg, yielding 1.7562 N. The displacement is -1.94 m, indicating downward movement. The work done by gravity is calculated using W = Fd, resulting in a positive value since the force of gravity acts in the same direction as the displacement. Proper sign conventions are crucial, as both the force and displacement should be negative if considering upward motion as positive. The final calculation confirms that gravity does positive work on the ball as it falls.
reaperkid
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 0.179 kg ball is thrown straight up from 1.94 m above the ground. Its initial vertical speed is 10.00 m/s. A short time later, it hits the ground. Calculate the total work done by the force of gravity during that time.

m = .179 kg
vi = 10m/s (upward)
g = 9.8 m/s2
d = -1.94 m (since the displacement is downward)

Homework Equations



W = Fd
F = ma

The Attempt at a Solution



This seemed like a simple problem, I'm not sure why it's giving me so much trouble. Basically, I just need to find the force of gravity which I thought was just 9.8 * .179 but I'm clearly missing something.

I tried... W = -1.94 * (9.8 * .179)

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
reaperkid said:

Homework Statement



A 0.179 kg ball is thrown straight up from 1.94 m above the ground. Its initial vertical speed is 10.00 m/s. A short time later, it hits the ground. Calculate the total work done by the force of gravity during that time.

m = .179 kg
vi = 10m/s (upward)
g = 9.8 m/s2
d = -1.94 m (since the displacement is downward)

Homework Equations



W = Fd
F = ma

The Attempt at a Solution



This seemed like a simple problem, I'm not sure why it's giving me so much trouble. Basically, I just need to find the force of gravity which I thought was just 9.8 * .179 but I'm clearly missing something.

I tried... W = -1.94 * (9.8 * .179)

Thanks

x_f^2=x_i^2+2ad, W=Fd\rightarrow W=mg(x_f^2-x_i^2)/2a.
 
asleight said:
x_f^2=x_i^2+2ad, W=Fd\rightarrow W=mg(x_f^2-x_i^2)/2a.

That doesn't incorporate the initial velocity though does it?

Wouldn't

xi = 1.94 m ?
xf = 0 m ?
 
Ignore asleight's nonsense.

You did almost the correct thing: you chose the displacement as negative (fine, that's just a convention), but then you should take the acceleration due to gravity as negative, too! Both are downward.

And even without thinking about sign conventions: does gravity do positive or negative net work here?
 
I seee, it's positive because it's in the direction of gravity.

Thank you very much sir! :)
 
You're welcome!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top