Piano & Penny vs Feather Dropped from Empire State Building

  • Thread starter Thread starter tatiana
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of air resistance affecting the fall of objects from the Empire State Building, specifically comparing a piano and a penny. In a vacuum, all objects would fall at the same rate, but in the atmosphere, air resistance causes lighter objects like feathers to descend more slowly. The conversation highlights that the fill-state of a coffee cup does not significantly impact the fall time of heavier objects. It is emphasized that the feather's higher surface area to mass ratio contributes to its slower descent compared to denser objects. Ultimately, the presence of air resistance is the key factor preventing different objects from hitting the ground simultaneously.
tatiana
Messages
43
Reaction score
1
I have a serious question, in all seriousness.. So you know how the theory says "if you dropped a piano and a penny off of the empire state buliding they would hit the ground at the same time" Well i was thinking and i wanted to know what would cause this not to be true.. when a coffe cup is empy this does not apply, neithe rif one of these objects were a feather??
 
Science news on Phys.org
If you were in a vacuum, then yes, they would take the same time to hit the ground. But seeing as we're not, air resistance comes into play, slowing the time of descent.
 
If you pumped all the air out of NYC -- which some folks believe to be the case already -- and dropped a piano, penny, cup of coffee, and feather, they would all land at the same time. Under more normal circumstances the wind resistance of each object would need to be taken into consideration so, for instance, the feather might never make it to the ground (at least where you could find it easily).

I'm not sure that the fill-state of the coffee cup would make much difference though.
 
In general, objects dropped in the atmosphere will not hit the ground at the exact same time due to drag. The difference between objects that aren't very light is not usually great enough that you would be able to tell a difference normally however. In a perfect vacuum everything would fall at the same rate since there would not be any drag.
 
As the others said it's the air that slows the feather down. Specifically, it's because the feather has a much higher ratio of surface area to mass.

Apollo 15 famously showed this on the moon (a vacuum), by dropping a feather and a hammer.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C5_dOEyAfk"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Your all right i forgot that were dealing with air resistance and were not in a vacuum
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top