Pion Annihilation: Can Neutral Pions Really Convert to Photons?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TriTertButoxy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Annihilation Pion
TriTertButoxy
Messages
190
Reaction score
0
I'm running into a dilemma:

I've recently worked out the Feynman rules for Chiral perturbation theory for 2 flavors, and discovered that the term

\mathcal{L}=\frac{f_\pi^2}{4} \Tr[(D_\mu U)^\dag (D^\mu U)]​

seems to contain the term ~ e^2 A_\mu A^\mu \pi^0 \,\pi^0 describing a direct interaction of two photons with two neutral pions. This is weird since the neutral pions don't carry electric charge to which photons can couple.

This term would allow the two neutral pions to annihilate into two photons. Can that happen, or did I make a mistake in computing the Feynman rules? Also, is there a reference containing all the Feynman rules for Chiral perturbation theory?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pions have no charge but they do have a charge form factor due to their quark structure.
pi0 + pi0 --> 2 photons is conceivable, but extremely unlikely.
Of course, a single pi0 decays to two photons via its electromagnetic interaction.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top