Pivot doing work on the rotating rod

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mechanics of a rod pivoting at one end, focusing on the conservation of mechanical energy. It highlights a confusion regarding the work done by the pivot point, which exerts a force perpendicular to the rod, leading to questions about energy conservation. Clarification is provided that if the hinge is frictionless, no work is done since the displacement at the pivot point is zero. The conversation also explores the implications of frictional torque, suggesting that work can be calculated using the formula W=Frθ if the frictional force is constant. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of understanding the role of forces and displacements in rotational dynamics.
LiftHeavy13
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
http://dev.physicslab.org/Document....taryMotion_RotationalDynamicsPivotingRods.xmlin this example, the rod is swinging with one end pivoted. conservation of energy was used in this example. the change in potential energy was converted to kinetic energy, and mechanical energy thus was supposedly conserved. However, I have a problem with this: the net work done on a body F(dot)d where at least a component of a force acts on a body in the same direction as the direction of the center of mass' movement. the pivot point exerts a force perpendicular to the rod (and therefore parallel to its center of mass' velocity vector), thus doing work on it... so how can mechanical energy be conserved? this makes no sense
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The work done by a force is F*d, where d is the displacement of the point of application. The force from the hinge acts on the end of the rod, whose displacement is zero. As long as the hinge is free of friction, no work is done by it.
 
Doc Al said:
The work done by a force is F*d, where d is the displacement of the point of application. The force from the hinge acts on the end of the rod, whose displacement is zero. As long as the hinge is free of friction, no work is done by it.

Damn man, thanks. I wasn't sure b/c every time I asked my physics teacher, he kept coming up with weird explanations for it. It's funny how a little detail like that will completely throw you off.


Just as a follow up, for a frictional torque about the pivot, would the work be that force (the frictional force) times d=θ(displaced)r(radius of the pivot)

so W=Frθ?

Because the frictional forces would act all around the pivot, not just in one place, right?
 
LiftHeavy13 said:
Just as a follow up, for a frictional torque about the pivot, would the work be that force (the frictional force) times d=θ(displaced)r(radius of the pivot)

so W=Frθ?
Yes, assuming that the friction force is constant.

Because the frictional forces would act all around the pivot, not just in one place, right?
I'd say because the surface that the hinge exerts a frictional force against undergoes a displacement as the hinge turns.
 
Doc Al said:
Yes, assuming that the friction force is constant.


I'd say because the surface that the hinge exerts a frictional force against undergoes a displacement as the hinge turns.

Okay, so you're treating the surface as an entire entity/point, correct?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top