Pivot doing work on the rotating rod

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mechanics of a pivoted rod in rotational motion, specifically addressing the conservation of mechanical energy and the work done by forces acting on the rod. Participants explore concepts related to energy conservation, work done by the pivot, and the implications of frictional forces in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how mechanical energy can be conserved if the pivot exerts a force perpendicular to the rod, suggesting that this force does work on the rod.
  • Another participant asserts that the work done by the hinge is zero because the displacement at the point of application (the end of the rod) is zero, provided the hinge is frictionless.
  • A later reply expresses gratitude for the clarification and notes confusion caused by previous explanations from a physics teacher.
  • Participants discuss the work done by frictional torque, proposing that it could be calculated as W=Frθ, where θ is the angular displacement and r is the radius of the pivot.
  • There is a suggestion that the frictional force acts around the pivot and that the surface against which the hinge exerts friction undergoes displacement as the hinge turns.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the work done by the pivot and the implications for energy conservation. While some agree on the zero work done by a frictionless hinge, others explore the effects of friction, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved regarding the role of frictional forces.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about frictionless conditions and the nature of forces acting on the rod, which may not be universally applicable. The treatment of frictional forces and their impact on energy conservation is also not fully resolved.

LiftHeavy13
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
http://dev.physicslab.org/Document....taryMotion_RotationalDynamicsPivotingRods.xmlin this example, the rod is swinging with one end pivoted. conservation of energy was used in this example. the change in potential energy was converted to kinetic energy, and mechanical energy thus was supposedly conserved. However, I have a problem with this: the net work done on a body F(dot)d where at least a component of a force acts on a body in the same direction as the direction of the center of mass' movement. the pivot point exerts a force perpendicular to the rod (and therefore parallel to its center of mass' velocity vector), thus doing work on it... so how can mechanical energy be conserved? this makes no sense
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The work done by a force is F*d, where d is the displacement of the point of application. The force from the hinge acts on the end of the rod, whose displacement is zero. As long as the hinge is free of friction, no work is done by it.
 
Doc Al said:
The work done by a force is F*d, where d is the displacement of the point of application. The force from the hinge acts on the end of the rod, whose displacement is zero. As long as the hinge is free of friction, no work is done by it.

Damn man, thanks. I wasn't sure b/c every time I asked my physics teacher, he kept coming up with weird explanations for it. It's funny how a little detail like that will completely throw you off.


Just as a follow up, for a frictional torque about the pivot, would the work be that force (the frictional force) times d=θ(displaced)r(radius of the pivot)

so W=Frθ?

Because the frictional forces would act all around the pivot, not just in one place, right?
 
LiftHeavy13 said:
Just as a follow up, for a frictional torque about the pivot, would the work be that force (the frictional force) times d=θ(displaced)r(radius of the pivot)

so W=Frθ?
Yes, assuming that the friction force is constant.

Because the frictional forces would act all around the pivot, not just in one place, right?
I'd say because the surface that the hinge exerts a frictional force against undergoes a displacement as the hinge turns.
 
Doc Al said:
Yes, assuming that the friction force is constant.


I'd say because the surface that the hinge exerts a frictional force against undergoes a displacement as the hinge turns.

Okay, so you're treating the surface as an entire entity/point, correct?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
5K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
6K