Planar interdigitated electrodes

  • Thread starter Thread starter fadzleyna
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrodes
AI Thread Summary
Calculating the design for planar interdigitated electrodes in a dielectric sensor is complex and depends on the sensor's size and the specific application, such as detecting water contamination in cooking oil. The sensor must effectively measure the dielectric constant through the container's wall, requiring a larger design with wider electrode separation to sample a greater volume of oil. Challenges include potential settling of wet oil and the influence of container material on measurements, suggesting that density might be a more reliable metric than dielectric constant alone. To enhance performance, using a differential electrode configuration and incorporating materials like closed-cell foam for screening can improve measurement accuracy. Ultimately, while interdigitated electrodes can be used, adjustments in design may be necessary to achieve the desired sensitivity and accuracy.
fadzleyna
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Capture.JPG


what is the formula to calculate planar interdigitated electrodes for dielectric sensor ?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.
There is no simple formula. It will depend on what scale you are considering and what response you require.
How big will your sensor be? What will it be sensing?
http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Guido_Huyberechts/publication/3706735_Nanoscaled_interdigitated_electrode_arrays_for_biochemical_sensors/links/0fcfd509414c26a078000000.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes fadzleyna
thanks Baluncore !

actually i want to design a dielectric sensor based on planar interdigitated electrodes that will be attached to a bottle filled with cooking oil to detect the quality of cooking oil.
until now i still confuse about it.
 
To measure the water contamination of cooking oil you can measure the dielectric constant of the emulsion through the wall of a plastic or glass container. There are several design choices that can make that possible. It might also be possible to measure the dielectric loss angle of the emulsion, but I think the water content will be quite detectable by capacitance alone since the oil and water have very different dielectric constants.

A problem you may have is that wet oil may settle to the bottom of the container and your sensor may be measuring the characteristics of the clear oil that rises above the wet oil. It is also possible that water will react with the oil to make a hydrocarbon hydroxide. That sludge may have a similar dielectric constant to the good oil. It might be better to use density rather than dielectric constant in that case.

Planar interdigitated electrodes are good for sensing material that is very close to the electrodes. The electric field geometry between the electrodes will be of a similar form, independent of the scale.

Since the sensor must “look” through the wall of the container, it should use a large sensor with wide separation between electrodes and a deep field. That will sample a greater volume of the oil. A very small sensor with many fingers will measure the characteristics of the container wall material only, with very little influence from the oil. The less sensor fingers you use, the bigger can be the sensor gaps and the deeper the sensor field can sample into the oil. There may be a small irregular gap between the wall and the sensor. The effect of that gap will be less for a large sensor than for a small sensor. You might consider a grease between the sensor and the bottle to eliminate the airgap.

Another problem is screening the sensor from behind. If a metallic screen is used and if that is placed close to the back of the sensor, then it will increase the fixed capacitance and so reduce the influence of the fluid. I would consider placing a slab of “closed cell foam” behind the sensor. Outside that foam I would attach a sheet metal screen for the sensor assembly. The thickness of a low dielectric constant foam will reduce the fixed capacitance. The screen will keep out external electrical interference. The sensor electronics can also be placed inside that foam cavity.

It might be good to use two differential electrodes inside a grounded case. The advantage of that configuration would be better screening and isolation from the external environment.

So I am suggesting you use a large differential pair of electrodes rather than a planar interdigitated electrode array.
 
  • Like
Likes fadzleyna
Baluncore said:
To measure the water contamination of cooking oil you can measure the dielectric constant of the emulsion through the wall of a plastic or glass container. There are several design choices that can make that possible. It might also be possible to measure the dielectric loss angle of the emulsion, but I think the water content will be quite detectable by capacitance alone since the oil and water have very different dielectric constants.

A problem you may have is that wet oil may settle to the bottom of the container and your sensor may be measuring the characteristics of the clear oil that rises above the wet oil. It is also possible that water will react with the oil to make a hydrocarbon hydroxide. That sludge may have a similar dielectric constant to the good oil. It might be better to use density rather than dielectric constant in that case.

Planar interdigitated electrodes are good for sensing material that is very close to the electrodes. The electric field geometry between the electrodes will be of a similar form, independent of the scale.

Since the sensor must “look” through the wall of the container, it should use a large sensor with wide separation between electrodes and a deep field. That will sample a greater volume of the oil. A very small sensor with many fingers will measure the characteristics of the container wall material only, with very little influence from the oil. The less sensor fingers you use, the bigger can be the sensor gaps and the deeper the sensor field can sample into the oil. There may be a small irregular gap between the wall and the sensor. The effect of that gap will be less for a large sensor than for a small sensor. You might consider a grease between the sensor and the bottle to eliminate the airgap.

Another problem is screening the sensor from behind. If a metallic screen is used and if that is placed close to the back of the sensor, then it will increase the fixed capacitance and so reduce the influence of the fluid. I would consider placing a slab of “closed cell foam” behind the sensor. Outside that foam I would attach a sheet metal screen for the sensor assembly. The thickness of a low dielectric constant foam will reduce the fixed capacitance. The screen will keep out external electrical interference. The sensor electronics can also be placed inside that foam cavity.

It might be good to use two differential electrodes inside a grounded case. The advantage of that configuration would be better screening and isolation from the external environment.

So I am suggesting you use a large differential pair of electrodes rather than a planar interdigitated electrode array.

but i had decide to use interdigitated electrodes in my proposal. what should i do now?
 
fadzleyna said:
but i had decide to use interdigitated electrodes in my proposal. what should i do now?
Revoke your decision, or compromise by building a “two finger” interdigitated electrode array.

It is hard to design because I do not know your container's size, wall thickness or material.
You can etch the electrode pattern and part of the ground screen on a single sided PCB.
 
Hi all, i have some questions about the tesla turbine: is a tesla turbine more efficient than a steam engine or a stirling engine ? about the discs of the tesla turbine warping because of the high speed rotations; does running the engine on a lower speed solve that or will the discs warp anyway after time ? what is the difference in efficiency between the tesla turbine running at high speed and running it at a lower speed ( as fast as possible but low enough to not warp de discs) and: i...
Thread 'Where is my curb stop?'
My water meter is submerged under water for about 95% of the year. Today I took a photograph of the inside of my water meter box because today is one of the rare days that my water meter is not submerged in water. Here is the photograph that I took of my water meter with the cover on: Here is a photograph I took of my water meter with the cover off: I edited the photograph to draw a red circle around a knob on my water meter. Is that knob that I drew a red circle around my meter...
Back
Top