Planck black body formula question

telegraphic
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all -- I had a question about the Planck black body / Johnson-Nyquist resistor temperature formula:

<br /> \[<br /> E_{\nu}^{2}d\nu=\frac{4R_{\nu}hd\nu}{e^{h\nu/kT}-1}\]<br />

I'm just wondering why the formula has $ exp(h\nu/kT)-1$ in the denominator? I would have expected $ exp(h\nu/kT)+1$ as electrons are fermions...

Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,
The formula you write is for radiation (photons).
 
Rajini said:
Hi,
The formula you write is for radiation (photons).

Hi Rajini, yeah I definitely agree that it's right for photons (Bose-Einstein statistics), but it apparently also holds for resistor noise -- in fact, I've written it in the form given by Nyquist in 1928 in his "thermal agitation of electric charge in conductors". So I guess my question is: why? Shouldn't electrons obey Fermi-Dirac statistics?
 
Hello,
Electrons obey the Fermi-statistics.
For photon Bose-Einstein (BES) statistics.
When you consider for radiation (photons) you use BES. So in the denominator of your formula -1 instead of +1.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top