Undergrad Planck had 2 definitions of energy in 1900, how?

Click For Summary
Planck's 1900 paper presents two definitions of energy: the discrete energy elements, hf, and the average energy, hf/(e^(hf/kT)-1). The first definition represents the energy of individual quanta of light, while the second describes the average energy of oscillators in thermal equilibrium at temperature T. This average energy accounts for the statistical distribution of energy levels, where the probability of occupancy influences the average. The confusion arises from reconciling these two concepts within the framework of quantum mechanics. Understanding this relationship is crucial for grasping the foundations of quantum theory and thermodynamics.
Cool4Kat
Messages
45
Reaction score
13
TL;DR
Planck's 1900 paper appears to have two equations for the energy, hf, and hf/(e^(hf/kT)-1), how does that work?
So, I was looking into Einstein's 1907 paper where he derived the specific heat of solids using quantum mechanics and I found that Einstein just took the derivative of Planck's equation from 1900 for the average energy, U, as a function of time (and multiplied it by 3N for the three dimensions). Anyway, that makes sense for Einstein but then I got very confused about Planck in 1900.

This is the same paper that Planck said that light was created in little energy elements with energy equal to hf. So, how can the average energy = hf/(e^(hf/kT)-1)? I feel like that means that the energy has two definitions. I feel like I am missing something basic, what is it?

Thank you so much!
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2019-06-22 at 11.53.21 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2019-06-22 at 11.53.21 PM.png
    21.8 KB · Views: 273
Physics news on Phys.org
Cool4Kat said:
Summary: Planck's 1900 paper appears to have two equations for the energy, hf, and hf/(e^(hf/kT)-1), how does that work?

In Planck's proposal, there are many energy levels - the difference between each neighbouring pair of levels if hf.

When things are in equilibrium at temperature T, the probability with which the different energy levels are occupied is such that the average energy is hf/(e^(hf/kT)-1).

The derivation is given in http://galileo.phys.virginia.edu/classes/252/PlanckStory.htm.
 
  • Like
Likes dlgoff
I am slowly going through the book 'What Is a Quantum Field Theory?' by Michel Talagrand. I came across the following quote: One does not" prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics. The ultimate test for a model is the agreement of its predictions with experiments. Although it may seem trite, it does fit in with my modelling view of QM. The more I think about it, the more I believe it could be saying something quite profound. For example, precisely what is the justification of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
636
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K