Please check my proof (generalized eigenspaces)

  • Thread starter Thread starter bennyska
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
bennyska
Messages
110
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


let T be a linear operator on V, and let λ be an eigenvalue of T. prove that if rank((T-λI)m = rank((T-λI)m+1 for some integer m, then Kλ = N((T-λI)m.


Homework Equations


this is part 4 of a 6 part proof, and in the earlier stages, i showed if rank((T-λI)m = rank((T-λI)m+1 for some integer m, then N((T-λI)m = N((T-λI)m+1.


The Attempt at a Solution


let x be in Kλ. by previous result, N((T-λI)m = N((T-λI)k for k≥ m. x is in Kλ, so x is in N((T-λI)p for some integer p. if p≥m, then x is in N((T-λI)m. if p<m, then m = p+t for some t. then (T-λI)p+t(x) = (T-λI)t(T-λI)p(x) = (T-λI)t(0)=0, so x is in N((T-λI)m.
let y be in N((T-λI)m. then y is in N((T-λI)p for some integer p, so y in in Kλ, and the two sets are equal.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
well, i see a mistake already, in the "if p≥m" part...
 
can i just say, since (T-λI)p(x)=0, then x is N((T-λI)m if m=p?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top