Please explain the Ising model in a simpler way, thank you

newbe318
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hello, can anyone please explain to me in a different approach, rather than repeating a book definition, what is the Ising model? and what conclusions were made from it?

I would sincerely appreciate it, since I can't seem to grasp the concept even after reading numerous articles online and in books.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How about you tell us what you understand so far so we can fill in the gaps and/or correct misunderstandings.
 
Probably we could give you simpler answer if you say what is not simple to understand. Nevertheless, in my opinion, Ising model is only a model which does not have any deep physics. To me, briefly, magnetic moments are vectors which could orientate in any direction and Ising model simply assumes that they could point up or down.
 
It's a very simplified model of magnetism. It's not intended to be accurate, but rather a conceptual model of how phase changes can happen in a toy model. At high temperatures, the spins of each 'atom' are random and give zero overall magnetization, but below a critical temperature, the spins are correlated to a degree, giving an overall magnetization.
 
Thank you so much. That clears up a lot of questions.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top