Please further explain this formula about voltage

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the relationship between back emf in an inductor and the potential difference (p.d.) across it. It clarifies that while both the back emf and the voltage drop across the inductor can be equal in magnitude, their directions are opposite. When the switch is closed, current flows from point E to G, and the equations for voltage must be interpreted based on the direction of current flow. The voltage across the inductor is the sum of the inductive voltage and the resistive voltage drop. Overall, the equations presented are deemed correct, reflecting the behavior of a practical inductor modeled with resistance.
Clara Chung
Messages
300
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


On the right bottom side ,when the switch is closed the equation is given V(EG)=
upload_2016-8-5_18-31-51.png
+V+V(FG)
The photo is attached

Homework Equations


Concept

The Attempt at a Solution


What is the difference between the back emf in the inductor and the p.d across the inductor? I think the current flow from E to G, the p.d. due to its resistance should be in opposite sign with the back emf in the inductor, but they are in the same sign as shown. Please explain.
 

Attachments

  • img022.jpg
    img022.jpg
    45.2 KB · Views: 474
  • upload_2016-8-5_18-33-41.png
    upload_2016-8-5_18-33-41.png
    209 bytes · Views: 494
Physics news on Phys.org
img022.jpg

When switch is closed, current flows from E to G. The non-ideal inductor can be modeled as an ideal inductor in series with its resistance.
Clara Chung said:
What is the difference between the back emf in the inductor and the p.d across the inductor?
The difference is in the directions. Voltage drop is numerically equal to the back emf of the inductor. Their directions are opposite. If voltage across inductor is 5V at a particular instant, that means 5V from the source are dropped across the inductor and its back emf at that instant is 5V.
 
  • Like
Likes Clara Chung
I tend to think that those two equitions need to be swopped around or alternatively they work if one is to move around the circuit in the anticlockwise direction, that is VGE, which is how they voltages would add up positively if one move up against the current.
 
  • Like
Likes Clara Chung
andrevdh said:
I tend to think that those two equitions need to be swopped around or alternatively they work if one is to move around the circuit in the anticlockwise direction, that is VGE, which is how they voltages would add up positively if one move up against the current.
Yes.

Perhaps VGE represents the potential at G relative to E. So, VGE is the change in potential if you start at E and move to G.

VEG is the change in potential if you start at G and move to E. The equations appear to be written in terms of VEG. The equations appear to me to be correct as written in the text.
 
  • Like
Likes Clara Chung
Clara Chung said:
What is the difference between the back emf in the inductor and the p.d across the inductor?
As cnh1995 pointed out, a practical inductor can be modeled as an ideal inductance in series with a resistance. So when you measure voltage across the terminals of a practical inductor you are measuring the sum of two voltages: voltage due to inductance, ##\color{blue}{L\dfrac{di}{dt}}## + Ohmic drop, ##\color{blue}{i{\cdot}R}##.
 
  • Like
Likes Clara Chung
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top